Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with ScotusSuit 302 headlines found


SMITH: Fantasyland at the Supreme Court

If Congress is to pass a law abridging free speech, the Court and the public deserve to know the reason. McCutcheon would be a good chance for the Court to reassert the primacy of political speech in the First Amendment.
National Review
added Oct 10, 2013 13:24

FISCHER: Did Scalia Really Say That? "Citizens United" Lurks Behind Supreme Court's Latest Money-in-Politics Case

after blowing a hole in the campaign finance infrastructure to allow unlimited independent expenditures, at least some Justices are trying to pull limits on direct contributions through the opening.
PR Watch
added Oct 10, 2013 13:20

Recommended Reading: McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission

“Whose expression is at stake when most people couldn’t even come near the limit?” asked Ginsburg. Scalia retorted, with his famous jolt of sarcasm, “I assume a law that only prohibits the speech of two percent of the country is okay.”
added Oct 10, 2013 03:56

Preview: 'Citizens United' -- The Sequel

Moyers talks with Yale Law School election and constitutional law professor Heather Gerken who warns that McCutcheon has the potential to be even worse than Citizens United. Political parties pay attention
added Oct 10, 2013 03:51

EDITORIAL: Uphold direct campaign donation limits: Our view

irate voters may decide that public financing and full disclosure are effective routes to good government. Both have passed the court's scrutiny. But until that happens, limits on donations remain a bulwark against bribery, legal and otherwise. The court
USA Today
added Oct 10, 2013 03:49

BOPP: Strike aggregate limits: Opposing view

the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the government's attempt to "mute the voices of affluent persons (to) equalize the ability to affect elections." And as to quid pro quo corruption, while the FEC agrees that contributing to nine candidates is non
USA Today
added Oct 10, 2013 03:46

WILL: Supreme Court can rescue another freedom in a campaign cash case

Congress, not content with having decided — no one knows how — how much is too much to give to a candidate, has decided how many candidates are too many candidates to support.
Human Events
added Oct 9, 2013 22:44
1 View

SIDES: The Supreme Court might strike down overall contribution limits. And that’s okay.

if McCutcheon is successful the campaign finance system might even become better in terms of transparency and promoting moderation in the nation’s politics.
Washington Post
added Oct 9, 2013 22:43
1 View

HILTZIK: The next Citizens United case?

The consequences of loosening the aggregate limit could be dire, re-creating "the system of legalized bribery that existed prior to the Watergate campaign finance scandals," warns Fred Wertheimer of the progressive group Democracy 21.
Los Angeles Times
added Oct 9, 2013 22:39

VIDEO; Supreme Court Weighs Limits on Individual Campaign Donations

Sen. Bernie Sanders: "The bottom line here is that if we do not want to move this nation to an oligarchic form of society, where a handful of billionaires can determine the outcome of these elections, then it is imperative not only that we overturn Citiz
Democracy Now!
added Oct 9, 2013 22:30
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines