Sort by:
Date added |
Date Published |
Most Viewed
Headlines Tagged with ScotusSuit — 49 headlines found
134
Views
Big Victory at Florida Supreme Court is Bad News for Cigarette Manufacturers
The majority clearly recognized and emphatically rejected the industry’s fundamental argument. “At its core, the defendants’ due process argument is an attack on our decision in Engle to give the Phase I findings res judicata – as opposed to issue precl
Mar 18, 2013
Public Health Advocacy Institute (PHAI)
added
Mar 20, 2013 00:24
92
Views
[Florida] Tobacco Cos. Ask High Court To Hear Engle Due Process Claims ($$)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Liggett Group LLC have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a $20 million judgment they say shows their due process rights are being trampled in Engle progeny cases — but only if the Florida high court rules against them i
Sep 14, 2012
Law360
added
Sep 19, 2012 14:31
89
Views
[Florida] Supreme Court Won't Hear Tobacco Cos.' Engle Challenge ($$)
Clay's attorney, John S. Mills of The Mills Firm, said Monday that the tobacco industry has tried in the individual Engle cases to "create a new false controversy of doubt by suggesting that the [Engle] jury only concluded that a few unspecified brands o
Nov 26, 2012
Law360
added
Nov 28, 2012 16:51
56
Views
[Florida] Reynolds Rejected by Court on $20 Million Smoker Award
The justices today refused to hear a joint appeal from R.J. Reynolds and Vector Group Ltd. (VGR)’s Liggett unit. A jury said the two companies were responsible for the death of Janie Mae Clay, who smoked for 40 years and died in 2003 of lung disease.
Nov 26, 2012
Business Week/Bloomberg
added
Nov 29, 2012 14:39
38
Views
Graphic tobacco warning labels to remain, but look, timetable unknown
The legality of placing graphic warnings on cigarette packages appears to have been settled when the U.S. Supreme Court declined today to hear an appeal on the labels from a group of tobacco manufacturers. However, it remains unclear what the warning la
Apr 22, 2013
Winston-Salem (NC) Journal
added
Apr 22, 2013 13:45
23
Views
Supreme Court Lets FDA Move Forward with Graphic Cigarette Warnings And Other Tobacco Regulations
The new warnings are needed to better inform Americans about the deadly consequences of smoking. As Congress found in enacting the requirement, the current, text-only warnings – which are printed on the side of cigarette packs and haven't been updated si
Apr 22, 2013
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
added
Apr 22, 2013 20:02
18
Views
ANDREWS: Graphic Tobacco Warning Case Can Present SCOTUS Opportunity on Commercial Speech Doctrine
If the Court decides to resolve the split between the D.C. and Sixth Circuits on the tobacco warnings, it may have an ideal opportunity to clarify the meaning of that critical part of its commercial speech test. Rather than simply continue to ignore Just
Sep 14, 2012
Forbes
added
Sep 14, 2012 20:08
17
Views
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to New Cigarette Labeling
However, even though the agency now has the authority to mandate new cigarette labels, the nature of those revisions remains tied up in another case. The FDA had hoped to add graphic warning labels on cigarette packs depicting the harmful effects of smo
Apr 22, 2013
HealthDay [HealthScout]
added
Apr 23, 2013 06:45
17
Views
Supreme Court denies cert in cigarette labeling case
The Supreme Court’s cert denial may leave the 6th Circuit decision intact, but because the FDA has indicated that it plans to engage in new rulemaking, the tobacco companies have effectively avoided compliance with the stringent new rules.
May 9, 2013
Lexology (uk)
added
May 10, 2013 09:58
15
Views
Supreme Court Refuses Big Tobacco's Labeling Appeal
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and other tobacco giants to review the Sixth Circuit's recent finding that a law requiring graphic warning labels on cigarette packs does not violate the First Amendment.
Apr 22, 2013
Law360
added
Apr 24, 2013 09:58