Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Op-Ed 19,366 headlines found

6 Views

[Georgia] SIMPSON: When health went up in smoke

In my youth, there were no restrictions on tobacco advertising, and the slogans and claims became fixed in our brains. The producer of Old Golds claimed there was “not a cough in a carload.” Lucky Strike printed and shouted their main slogan, “LS/MFT — L
Columbus (GA) Ledger-Enquirer
added Aug 31, 2018 02:04
5 Views

THOMPSON: The tobacco paradox

It may well be unpalatable to many that Big Tobacco is offering a potential answer to weaning people off cigarettes, but it is harm reduction in action: limiting the impact is surely better than unrealistically trying to eradicate the problem all togethe
NewsBlaze
added Aug 31, 2018 01:32
4 Views

GLANTZ: RJR's consumer perceptions studies are poorly designed and fail to provide sufficient evidence for FDA to allow RJR to market Camel Snus as less dangerous; likely to make readers thing they are safe

Lucy Popova from GSU, Lauren Lempert, Pam Ling, and I submitted this comment to FDA on RJR's application to see Camel Snus as a reduced risk product. The regulations.gov tracking number is 1k2-9510-dtqo. A PDF of the comment is available here.
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:52
7 Views

FELSHER: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Application for Six Camel SNUS Smokeless Tobacco Minimizes its Appeal to Adolescents and the Likelihood that Youth and Adolescents Will Initiate Smokeless Tobacco or Smokeless Tobacco with Other Products

Bonnie Halpern Felsher from Stanford, in collaboration with colleagues at UCSF submitted this comment to FDA on RJR's application to market Camel Snus as a less dangerous product. The tracking number on regulations.gov is 1k2-9510-ujes. A PDF of the co
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:50
5 Views

GLANTZ: Reynolds’ own data do not support their claim that because exclusive users of Camel Snus experience lower levels of exposure to some toxicants, they will reduce their risk of harm from lung cancer, oral cancer, respiratory disease, and heart dise

My colleagues at UCSF have submitted this public comment to FDA regarding RJR's application to sell Camel Snus as a reduced risk product. The tracking number at regulations.gov is 1k2-9510-3zjn. A PDF of the comment is here.
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:48
4 Views

GLANTZ: Clinical Trials and Observational Epidemiology Indicate that Allowing Snus to be Marketed with Modified Risk

My colleagues and I at UCSF have submitted this public comment to FDA on RJR's application to market Camel Snus as less dangerous. The tracking number on regulations.gov is 1k2-9510-3515. A PDF of the comment is here.
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:43
8 Views

GLANTZ: Two new peer reviewed papers discuss how PMI's own data shows they are as dangerous, maybe worse, than cigarettes

As the title " PMI’s own in vivo clinical data on biomarkers of potential harm in Americans show that IQOS is not detectably different from conventional cigarettes" indicates, PMI's own data shows that the measures of health impact that IQOS has are not
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:39
2 Views

[Australia] GALLAGHER/GILMORE: Big Tobacco is consistently overstating black market in cigarettes – new findings

Our paper concludes that “the quality of industry data on illicit tobacco as a whole is below the expected standard to be considered reliable”. We add that the consistency of this “may indicate that the tobacco industry is deliberately producing misleadi
The Conversation (au)
added Sep 5, 2018 21:37
4 Views

Summary of the 5 public comments UCSF TCORS submitted to FDA on why FDA should not approve allowing RJR to claim Camel Snus is a less dangerous product

This letter to TPSAC summarizes the UCSF TCORS' public comments to FDA on the RJR application to FDA to be allowed to market Camel Snus as less dangerous. The tracking number in regulations.gov is 1k2-9510-dtqo. A PDF of the letter (including all the i
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Aug 26, 2018 14:41
2 Views

How should governments deal with multinational consulting firms that work for the tobacco industry?

The New Zealand Ministry of Health is currently using a consulting firm EY (formerly Ernst & Young) to research the impacts of tobacco taxation, despite EY’s work locally and internationally for tobacco companies. This decision may breach the (FCTC), at
British Medical Journal
added Aug 24, 2018 14:51
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines