Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with FDASuit 355 headlines found

12 Views

DC Circuit Affirms District Court: Court of Appeals rules in favor of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and other manufacturers in graphic warnings lawsuit (PDF)

the Court held that the proposed warnings violated the First Amendment because the “FDA has not provided a shred of evidence - much less the substantial evidence required by the APA - showing that the graphic warnings will ‘directly advance’ its interest
Reynolds American (RAI)
added Aug 24, 2012 16:07
10 Views

US Court of Appeals for DC Circuit deals painful blow to FDA, public health and consumers

this Court’s logic, the small Surgeon General textual warnings might also violate the cigarette companies’ rights to commercial free speech because there is inadequate scientific proof that those labels reduce smoking rates.
Public Health Advocacy Institute (PHAI)
added Aug 24, 2012 15:49
6 Views

DC Circ. Finds Tobacco Graphic Warnings Unconstitutional ($$)

A three-judge panel ruled in a 2-1 decision that the FDA did not present any data to the court that demonstrated the warnings would reduce smoking rates, the agency's stated goal for the initiative.
Law360
added Aug 24, 2012 15:47
7 Views

RJR v. FDA (PDF)

The First Amendment requires the government not only to state a substantial interest justifying a regulation on commercial speech, but also to show that its regulation directly advances that goal. FDA failed to present any data—much less the substantial e
US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
added Aug 24, 2012 15:08
12 Views

Federal court smacks down new tobacco labels

The FDA, Judge Brown writes, “offers no evidence showing that such warnings have directly caused a material decrease in smoking rates.”
Washington Post
added Aug 24, 2012 15:05
10 Views

Sector Snap: Court ruling boosts cigarette makers

Shares of tobacco companies traded higher Friday after a federal appeals court ruled in the industry's favor, blocking the Food and Drug Administration requiring large, graphic health warnings about the risks of smoking on cigarette packages.
AP - Associated Press
added Aug 24, 2012 15:03
6 Views

Court Ruling Against Cigarette Warnings is Wrong on the Science and Law and Should be Appealed

The Justice Department should quickly appeal today's ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that struck down the large, graphic cigarette warnings required by the landmark 2009 law giving the FDA authority over tobacco products. Today's
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
added Aug 24, 2012 15:02
2 Views

UPDATE 3-U.S. court strikes down graphic warnings on cigarettes

* Appeals court says law violates corporate speech rights * Supreme Court may have to weigh in on divergent rulings
Reuters
added Aug 24, 2012 15:00
2 Views

Court upholds block on graphic cigarette warnings

A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a decision barring the federal government from requiring tobacco companies to put large graphic health warnings on cigarette packages to show that smoking can disfigure and even kill people.
AP - Associated Press
added Aug 24, 2012 14:57
3 Views

D.C. Circuit: Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Violate First Amendment

A divided federal appeals court today struck down as unconstitutional proposed graphic warning labels that government officials wanted to slap on cigarette packs to deter smoking.
The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
added Aug 24, 2012 14:48
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines