Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with FDASuit 425 headlines found

8 Views

MO v. FDA: Portions of Administrative Record Cited in Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal and Memorandum of Law in Support of Recusal, Dec. 14, 2015

E Letter from James E. Dillard, III, Altria Client Services re: Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0147 (76 Fed. Reg. 55,927 (Sept. 9, 2011)) – Comments on the “Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Demonstrating the Substantial Equivalence of a New Tobacco Prod
Tobacco On Trial
added Dec 16, 2015 06:13
8 Views

MO v. FDA: PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE REGARDING PORTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD CITED IN THEIR MOTION FOR RECUSAL

Pursuant to this Court’s December 11, 2015 Order, Plaintiffs respectfully submit the portions of the administrative record cited in Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal and Memorandum of Law in Support of Recusal. ECF No. 25. Those materials are attached as Ex
Tobacco On Trial
added Dec 16, 2015 06:07
5 Views

Tobacco Companies Want Judge to Recuse Over Law Firm Ties

The tobacco companies first hinted that they might have a problem with Mehta’s assignment last month, when they filed a rare “notice of informational request” with the court. They asked the judge to explain Zuckerman’s relationship with the Campaign for
National Law Journal
added Nov 13, 2015 13:32
5 Views

Tobacco Companies Want Judge to Recuse Over Law Firm Ties

Lawyers for six U.S. tobacco companies challenging the FDA’s regulation of product labels asked U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta this week to step down from the case. Their concern: Mehta’s former law firm, Zuckerman Spaeder, worked for anti-tobacco groups
National Law Journal
added Nov 13, 2015 02:26
11 Views

THE BRIEFCASE: Big Three request summary judgment / Reynolds, Santa Fe ask for more response time

According to the lawsuit, “over the past four years, FDA has suggested varying interpretations of the act that would improperly broaden the agency’s regulatory authority over tobacco product labels and product quantities.”
Winston-Salem (NC) Journal
added Nov 4, 2015 11:13
14 Views

MO v. FDA: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10/30/15

directive … is inconsistent with the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, violates the substantive and procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, infringes Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights, and is unconstitutionally vague
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 3, 2015 23:58
11 Views

MO v. FDA: DOCKET Sep 30-Nov 3, 2015

11/03/2015 MINUTE ORDER granting 22 Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal, and 23 Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal.
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 3, 2015 23:32
12 Views

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC et. al. v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit to challenge recent action by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking to assert a broad power of prior restraint over Plaintiffs’ marketing communications, even though the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosme
LiabilityDesk
added Nov 3, 2015 22:38
7 Views

Tobacco Cos. Seek Quick Win In FDA Labeling Suit ($$)

Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco companies on Friday asked a D.C. federal judge to rule in their favor exactly one month after accusing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of overstepping its authority and violating the First Amendment wit
Law360
added Nov 3, 2015 22:22
9 Views

RIVKIN/FOLEY: The Supreme Court's bad call on Affordable Care Act

the precedent upon which the King majority relied for this contextual interpretation, FDA vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp. (2000)...manufacturers challenged [FDA's] authority to regulate tobacco products as “medical devices” or “drugs.” The court co
Los Angeles Times
added Jun 30, 2015 08:36
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines