Headlines Tagged with FDASuit — 411 headlines found
A federal appeals court in Washington Wednesday refused to rehear a case in which a federal judge struck down graphic images on cigarette packages. The refusal came in a two-sentence unsigned order.
Dec 5, 2012 UPI
added Dec 5, 2012 18:35
The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington reaffirmed Wednesday its August decision that the labels violate tobacco companies' free-speech rights under the First Amendment.
Dec 5, 2012 Winston-Salem (NC) Journal
added Dec 5, 2012 18:33
If the federal government demands health warnings on cigarette packs, why doesn't it also demand similar warnings on other products that also carry known health risks, like liquor?
Dec 4, 2012 American Reporter
added Dec 4, 2012 01:44
Implications of Court Order for Tobacco Companies to Make “Corrective Statements:” Implications for the FDA and Industry Power
the tobacco companies are nothing if not well-practiced at skirting the law and pushing the system to its limits. As a result, their implementation of this order needs to be monitored carefully and aggressively.
Nov 28, 2012 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Nov 30, 2012 10:24
"These restrictions and requirements strike at the heart of advertiser rights to convey truthful information about legal products to adults," the Association of National Advertisers, American Advertising Federation and American Association of Advertising
Nov 28, 2012 MediaPost (Media Magazine)
added Nov 29, 2012 16:00
The battle over graphic cigarette warning labels is being fought on another front now that several tobacco companies as well as a member of the National Association of Tobacco Outlets (NATO) have filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Sup
Nov 6, 2012 Convenience Store News
added Nov 6, 2012 16:38
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and other tobacco giants are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a Sixth Circuit decision requiring them to label their products with graphic warnings they say violate the First Amendment, according to a recent high court p
Nov 1, 2012 Law360
added Nov 2, 2012 15:09
Lawyers for major tobacco companies said Monday they do not want the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to touch a panel's ruling that went against the government's controversial graphic warning labels requirement.
Oct 30, 2012 The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
added Oct 31, 2012 18:59
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and other tobacco giants urged the D.C. Circuit on Monday not to reconsider its recent finding that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's mandatory graphic warnings for cigarette packages are unconstitutional, saying the agency
Oct 30, 2012 Law360
added Oct 31, 2012 18:53
Two federal appellate courts are now split over whether the government can force the tobacco industry to place graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. The division between the two circuits, which disagree on the level of scrutiny this regulation of
Oct 22, 2012 JD Supra, LLC
added Oct 31, 2012 19:02