Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with FDASuit 356 headlines found

3 Views

[UK] DAUBE/MOODIE/McKEE: Towards a smoke-free world? Philip Morris International's new Foundation is not credible [Free Full Text]

This latest initiative changes nothing. Tobacco companies will continue to lie and deceive. They will continue to seek and find researchers and others—“lobbyists, door-openers, strategists, spin doctors”25—who are willing to accept money and work with an
The Lancet (uk)
added Oct 17, 2017 19:36
3 Views

[Massachusetts] Make warnings on cigarette packs scary, health groups say

A lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal District Court in Boston aims to force the Food and Drug Administration to require cigarette packages to display images starkly depicting what tobacco can do to the human body. Dozens of countries already require such
Boston (MA) Globe
added Oct 5, 2016 01:17
3 Views

Federal e-cigarette rules on parallel track with new California law

California already barred people under the age of 18 from buying e-cigarettes, so the federal rule won’t change that. But because Brown also signed a bill boosting the age for buying to tobacco to 21, Californians will now need to be 21 to buy e-cigarett
Sacramento (CA) Bee
added May 6, 2016 11:42
3 Views

WHITE: Symposium: Defining deference down

Last year, in Loving v. IRS, the court invoked Brown & Williamson in holding that the IRS was unreasonable in interpreting its statutory jurisdiction ...Two years earlier, the D.C. Circuit invoked Brown & Williamson’s “major questions” doctrine to strike
SCOTUSBlog
added Jun 26, 2015 09:15
3 Views

Cigarette ordinance passes court test

A New York City ordinance that governs the sale of flavored tobacco products is not pre-empted by a federal law that assigns authority to regulate cigarettes to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. The ordi
Talk Radio News Service
added Feb 27, 2013 11:04
3 Views

Case Study: RJ Reynolds V. FDA ($$)

The Nov. 7, 2011, decision of Judge Richard J. Leon . . . confirms that regulated entities should scrutinize agency rules from the perspective of the free speech implications of the rules.
Law360
added Oct 10, 2012 16:20
3 Views

Mealey's Litigation Bulletin Tobacco: Federal Appeals Court Rules that Graphic Warnings Violate Tobacco Companies' Rights

Unlike in Warner-Lambert Co. v. FTC, 562 F.2d 749 (D.C. Cir. 1977), the panel said, the FDA has not shown that the graphic warnings were designed to correct past false or misleading claims or that, absent disclosure, consumers would likely be deceived by
Lexis Nexis
added Aug 25, 2012 11:39
3 Views

D.C. Circuit: Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Violate First Amendment

A divided federal appeals court today struck down as unconstitutional proposed graphic warning labels that government officials wanted to slap on cigarette packs to deter smoking.
The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
added Aug 24, 2012 14:48
2 Views

Life Sciences Group Of The Year: King & Spalding ($$)

won the mid-trial dismissal of a suit claiming GlaxoSmithKline’s antidepressant Paxil causes birth defects, successfully challenged FDA guidance for R.J. Reynolds and led small biotech companies in major transactions, earning the firm a spot as one of Law
Law360
added Feb 15, 2017 01:26
2 Views

Pediatricians, American Cancer Society Take FDA To Court Over Delayed Graphic Warning Labels On Cigarettes

It’s been more than seven years since the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act became law, directing the Food and Drug Administration to bolster warnings on tobacco labels and to create graphic warning images to be printed on cigarette packa
The Consumerist (blog)
added Oct 5, 2016 01:23
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines