Headlines Tagged with DOJ Suit — 2,360 headlines found
5999: ORDER #35-Remand setting a Motion Hearing for Thursday, February 7, 2013, at 10:00 am (1/23/13)
It is this 23rd day of January, 2013, hereby ORDERED, that a Motion Hearing shall be held on Thursday, February 7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. on the issue of point-of-sale displays
Jan 23, 2013 Tobacco On Trial
added Jan 29, 2013 21:05
ORDER #80-Remand granting 6252 consent motion to continue hearing. The hearing previously set for March 27, 2018 is continued to April 17, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
Mar 26, 2018 Tobacco On Trial
added Mar 30, 2018 19:57
USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. #6248: REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS AND REMEDIES PARTIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MASTER
The parties are now within steps of a total agreement, needing minimal help to close the deal. But Plaintiffs have suddenly stopped short, insisting that Defendants either capitulate to Plaintiffs’ every demand or proceed on their own at risk of contempt
Feb 13, 2018 Tobacco On Trial
added Feb 16, 2018 02:14
A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected R.J. Reynolds' bid to void a decade-old order requiring tobacco companies to televise "corrective" advertisements....did not show that the judge who ordered the ads exceeded her authority, and waited too long to
Nov 1, 2016 Reuters
added Nov 1, 2016 17:47
A federal appeals court on Monday signaled it may scale back a judge’s order requiring tobacco companies to say in product warnings that the industry deceived the American public about the dangers of smoking.
Feb 23, 2015 The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition
added Feb 23, 2015 21:38
Kessler sits on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and far as I can tell, she’s never lived here and doesn’t know (or care) about the good that R.J. Reynolds has done.
Jan 12, 2015 Winston-Salem (NC) Journal
added Jan 12, 2015 23:34
Tobacco companies on Wednesday accused a federal judge of forcing them to inaccurately describe themselves as unscrupulous villains who continue to deceive the public....would only trigger public anger against the companies and should be scrapped.
Jan 7, 2015 AP - Associated Press
added Jan 7, 2015 19:23
to publicly announce you have lied to your consumers and deceived them about the appealing nature of your delicious products must have significant implications for tobacco-related litigation. Mind you, this is not an apology. That seems to be a step too
Jan 31, 2014 Sydney Morning Herald (au)
added Jan 30, 2014 23:59
Carol Denney says the latest smoking fad -- e-cigarettes -- is the same old story. ... are they good for you? Bad for you? Only the guy who owns the proprietary research knows for sure, and in many cases, the tobacco industry owns him.
Apr 18, 2013 KQED (San Francisco, CA)
added Apr 20, 2013 15:47
This footnote means that Kessler will issue a followup order and either eliminate the requirement for the manufacturers to place corrective statement posters in retail stores or change her order to take into account the rights of the innocent third parti
Dec 4, 2012 CSP News (Convenience Store/Petroleum)
added Dec 4, 2012 16:59