Sort by:
Date added |
Date Published |
Most Viewed
Headlines Tagged with Court Documents — 700 headlines found
6
Views
[Arkansas] PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER (PDF)
There are lessons to be learned from the Thayer case, and this Court should not countenance here the "spectacle" that occurred there. To repeat, Philip Morris has not shown "good cause" for the entry of any protective order. Supposing it had, though, the
Nov 19, 2012
Arkansas Times
added
Nov 20, 2012 19:08
4
Views
[Arkansas] PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER (PDF)
In short, none of plaintiffs' arguments can justify diverging from the more than three dozen courts that have entered substantially similar confidentiality orders to the one proposed by PM USA, nor requiring FM USA to disclose Confidential or Highly Conf
Nov 1, 2012
Arkansas Times
added
Nov 20, 2012 19:04
1
View
[Missouri] GALLAGHER v. CITY OF CLAYTON (PDF)
the district court1 dismissed Gallagher’s federal claims as facially implausible and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claim. Gallagher appeals the dismissal of his federal claims. We affirm.
Nov 8, 2012
US Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit
added
Nov 10, 2012 19:47
7
Views
MESSER v. STATE OF IOWA (pdf)
The district court found Lorraine Messer guilty of fraudulent practice in the third degree for possessing 218 packs of cigarettes lacking tax stamps. . . . we affirm the decision of the court of appeals and the judgment, conviction, and sentence of the
Oct 26, 2012
Radio Iowa
added
Oct 26, 2012 15:46
3
Views
JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 43 (5 October 2012)
For the reasons set out above, the Packaging Act restrictions, which effectively prohibit the plaintiffs from using their property for advertising or promotional purposes, while severe from a commercial viewpoint, do not operate so as to effect an acquis
Oct 9, 2012
Australasian Legal Information Institute
added
Oct 23, 2012 14:02
6
Views
[Canada] IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED v. CONSEIL QUÉBÉCOIS SUR LE TABAC ET LA SANTÉ JEAN-YVES BLAIS CÉCILIA LÉTOURNEAU
Oct 15, 2012
Quebec Superior Court (ca)
added
Oct 18, 2012 15:13
4
Views
[Ohio] Barry D. Edney v. Life Ambulance Service, Inc. et al. (PDF)
Appellant claimed that he began coughing and wheezing and became short of breath after being exposed to secondhand smoke from coworkers who were smoking in the workplace. . . . Appellant's claim sought compensation for a condition of chest pain. Appellee
Sep 20, 2012
Supreme Court of Ohio
added
Oct 16, 2012 01:25
30
Views
Tobacco Litigation Documents
National Litigation * U.S. v. Philip Morris USA, et al. (RICO case) * U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Oct 14, 2012
University of California at San Francisco (UCSF)
added
Oct 14, 2012 17:24
55
Views
[Florida] Tobacco Appeal Bonds
During the 2009 Legislative Session, the Legislature passed a bill (SB 2198) relating to the posting of security with regard to judgments against tobacco companies that were participants in the settlement of the State's case against tobacco companies, S
Sep 13, 2012
Florida Supreme Court
added
Oct 14, 2012 03:43
6
Views
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, et al.: APPELLANTS’ PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
this case presents a question of exceptional importance. The majority’s reasoning is wrong and it conflicts with the Sixth Circuit’s analysis of graphics in Discount Tobacco. We respectfully submit that the case should be reheard en banc.
Oct 9, 2012
Law360
added
Oct 10, 2012 15:54