Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,333 headlines found

10 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY vs. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al.: ORDER GRANTING PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER REQUIRING PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. TO PAY FEES AND EXPENSES

Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order to prevent any further deposition of Dr. Scheinbart is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Counsel for Philip Morris USA Inc. shall have one (1) additional hour of time for questioning Dr. Sc
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 17, 2016 23:19
9 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY vs. R.J. REYNOLDS, et. al.: PHILIP MORRIS USA’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER REQUIRING PHILIP MORRIS USA TO PAY FEES AND EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTINUED DEPOSITION OF DR. LEE SCHEINBART (PDF)

Plaintiff’s counsel has already used the Court’s ruling as a platform to disparage Mr. Suarez (and all of Defendants’ lawyers) publicly, accusing him of “egregious” and “unprofessional” behavior to reporters who published articles in two prominent trad
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 17, 2016 23:11
5 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS (PDF)

Defendants move to strike Forsyth’s claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, and in the alternative move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, the motions will be granted.
DocumentCloud.org
added Nov 11, 2016 21:02
11 Views

[Florida] CRANE CO., R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., and HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE CO., Appellants, v. RICHARD DELISLE and ALINE DELISLE, his wife, Appellees. (PDF)

As we are reversing for a new trial for R.J. Reynolds based on the improper admission of the expert testimony, the new trial should include the issue of damages because of the foregoing analysis. At a new trial, the court should also reconsider t
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 11, 2016 13:05
2 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE POST-HEARING BRIEF, Nov 7, 2016

The sole justification Plaintiff offers for his post-hearing brief is counsel’s opinion that he could have done a better job articulating his arguments at the hearing. That is not a valid justification. If it were, there would be no end to the briefs par
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 8, 2016 23:54
6 Views

CEI v DOT: PETITIONER REPLY BRIEF filed by Competitive Enterprise Institute, Consumer Advocates for Smokefree Alternatives Association and Gordon Cummings, Nov 4, 2016

DOT’s claim that e-cigarettes pose a safety threat to airline passengers rests on sheer speculation—studies that state only that more research is needed. DOT attempts to sidestep this issue by expressly resting its authority on “passenger discomfort, whic
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 7, 2016 21:50
4 Views

RICHARD VILLARREAL v. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY PINSTRIPE INC United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

And we conclude that Villarreal is not entitled to equitable tolling of his claim of disparate treatment because he admitted facts that establish that he did not diligently pursue his rights. We affirm in part and remand for the panel to address the remai
Findlaw
added Nov 7, 2016 18:28
7 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY v. RJR: TRANSCRIPT (PDF)

Proceedings before the Honorable Charles 12 Roberts, Circuit Judge..."Now, the jury, if they conclude that Mr. Dubinsky died from skin cancer in this case, then plaintiffs will not be able to establish medical causation on their wrongful death claim.
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2016 22:41
19 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY v. RJR: MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. LEE SCHEINBART (PDF)

Because the conduct of defense counsel in this case was unprofessional toward plaintiff’s counsel, and made the witness feel harassed and intimidated, Plaintiff seeks a protective order preventing any further discovery depositions of Dr. Scheinbart.
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2016 22:28
9 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: PLAINTIFF’S [PROPOSED] POSTHEARING BRIEF, Nov 3, 2016

If the speech does not qualify as speech in furtherance of an issue of “public interest” under 425.16 (e)(3) and (4), defendants fail to satisfy the first prong of the analysis. For the reasons stated in the Response at 9-16, the ratings are quintessentia
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 3, 2016 22:27
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines