Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,313 headlines found

3 Views

CEI v DOT: BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS, Oct 7, 2016

To protect airline passengers from secondhand exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, the final rule clarifies that the use of e-cigarettes on aircraft constitutes “smoking” within the meaning of the statutory ban on smoking on aircraft. The final rule is a rea
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 12, 2016 19:37
4 Views

DOCKET for CEI v DOT 4/28-10/12/16

CLERK’S ORDER filed granting petitioners’ unopposed motion to extend time to file the reply brief, The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: PETITIONER Reply Brief due 11/04/2016. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 11/14/2016. Final Briefs due 11/28/2016
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 12, 2016 19:10
7 Views

COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, THE CONSUMER ADVOCATES FOR SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES ASSOCIATION, and GORDON CUMMINGS v DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: OPENING BRIEF OF PETITIONERS (PDF)

DOT improperly banned the use of e-cigarettes under the anti-smoking statute, 49 U.S.C. § 41706, because e-cigarettes do not burn (or even contain) tobacco, much less produce smoke. DOT’s reliance on the anti-smoking statute to ban e-cigarettes violates t
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)
added Oct 12, 2016 18:51
47 Views

DOCKET for NICOPURE LABS v. FDA et al, Oct 11, 2016

Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Amy Berman Jackson: Motions Hearing held on 10/11/2016 re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NICOPURE LABS, LLC; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, ET AL., 44 MOTI
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 11, 2016 21:54
6 Views

[UK, Maryland, Pennsylvania] CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS (PDF)

CERTIORARI DENIED...15-1299 R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO, ET AL. V. KANE, ATT'Y GEN. OF PA
Supreme Court of the United States
added Oct 11, 2016 15:47
3 Views

FORSYTH v MPAA: DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION, Oct 6, 2016

On September 29, 2016, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in In re Tam...The question presented by the petition is “Whether the disparagement provision in [the Lanham Act] is facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.”
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 7, 2016 04:08
14 Views

[Massachusetts] Health Groups v. FDA: COMPLAINT (PDF)

plaintiffs ask that the Court: (1) Declare the FDA to be in violation of the Tobacco Control Act; (2) Issue an order under § 706(1) of the APA or a writ of mandamus to compel the FDA to submit for the Court’s review a proposed timetable for expedited rule
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
added Oct 4, 2016 16:20
28 Views

[Florida] REYNOLDS, PHILIP MORRIS USA and LIGGETT, Appellants, v. MARVINE CALLOWAY (PDF)

TAYLOR, J, dissenting....Although I agree that many of the comments made by plaintiff’s counsel were improper, I would find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that they did not constitute a sufficient basis for a mistrial. I would therefor
Wolters Kluwer
added Sep 30, 2016 12:54
3 Views

[Australia] Johnson v Cancer Council of Victoria (Review and Regulation) [2016] VCAT 1596

For the reasons given, I find that the disclosure of Document 1 would divulge information communicated in confidence by or on behalf of a person to the Council, and the disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest by reason that
Australasian Legal Information Institute
added Sep 28, 2016 10:16
18 Views

[Florida] HOWARD & ASSOCIATES and RICHARD A. DAYNARD vs. LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN: ORDER (PDF)

no opinion regarding the best forum to resolve the pending disputes among attorneys regarding the distribution of attorneys' fees in the Engle litigation. The Court merely concludes in this Order that Lieff Cabraser's removal of this action did not confor
Amazon CloudFront
added Sep 28, 2016 09:22
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines