Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,309 headlines found

2 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE POST-HEARING BRIEF, Nov 7, 2016

The sole justification Plaintiff offers for his post-hearing brief is counsel’s opinion that he could have done a better job articulating his arguments at the hearing. That is not a valid justification. If it were, there would be no end to the briefs par
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 8, 2016 23:54
6 Views

CEI v DOT: PETITIONER REPLY BRIEF filed by Competitive Enterprise Institute, Consumer Advocates for Smokefree Alternatives Association and Gordon Cummings, Nov 4, 2016

DOT’s claim that e-cigarettes pose a safety threat to airline passengers rests on sheer speculation—studies that state only that more research is needed. DOT attempts to sidestep this issue by expressly resting its authority on “passenger discomfort, whic
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 7, 2016 21:50
4 Views

RICHARD VILLARREAL v. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY PINSTRIPE INC United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

And we conclude that Villarreal is not entitled to equitable tolling of his claim of disparate treatment because he admitted facts that establish that he did not diligently pursue his rights. We affirm in part and remand for the panel to address the remai
Findlaw
added Nov 7, 2016 18:28
7 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY v. RJR: TRANSCRIPT (PDF)

Proceedings before the Honorable Charles 12 Roberts, Circuit Judge..."Now, the jury, if they conclude that Mr. Dubinsky died from skin cancer in this case, then plaintiffs will not be able to establish medical causation on their wrongful death claim.
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2016 22:41
19 Views

[Florida] DUBINSKY v. RJR: MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF DR. LEE SCHEINBART (PDF)

Because the conduct of defense counsel in this case was unprofessional toward plaintiff’s counsel, and made the witness feel harassed and intimidated, Plaintiff seeks a protective order preventing any further discovery depositions of Dr. Scheinbart.
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2016 22:28
9 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: PLAINTIFF’S [PROPOSED] POSTHEARING BRIEF, Nov 3, 2016

If the speech does not qualify as speech in furtherance of an issue of “public interest” under 425.16 (e)(3) and (4), defendants fail to satisfy the first prong of the analysis. For the reasons stated in the Response at 9-16, the ratings are quintessentia
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 3, 2016 22:27
2 Views

[California] FORSYTH v MPAA: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A POST-HEARING BRIEF, Nov 3, 2016

At the hearing on October 28, counsel did not feel that the Court’s questions on the three subjects addressed in the attached proposed document were adequately dealt with by counsel at the time. The failing was the undersigned’s, but the consequences redo
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 3, 2016 22:15
44 Views

NICOPURE v FDA: SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to Respond to the Court’s October 26, 2016 by FDA, Nov 1, 2016

If an NFL is not a “tobacco product”—that is, if it is not made or derived from tobacco and does not meet the definition of a “component or part”—then it is not subject to the deeming rule, and a premarket application is not required. Thus, the FDA does
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 2, 2016 21:48
19 Views

NICOPURE v FDA: SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM re Minute Order by AMERICAN E-LIQUID MANUFACTURING STANDARDS ASSOCIATION, et. al. Nov 1, 2016

Plaintiffs’ challenge presents a purely legal threshold question: Whether FDA may ever regulate Non-Tobacco E-liquids, under any circumstance. Such a facial challenge is fit for review, and postponing review would expose Plaintiffs to significant hardship
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 2, 2016 21:32
15 Views

[California, Illinois, New York] In re Fontem US, Inc. Consumer Class Action Litig. Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (PDF)

The FDA has stated that the heading was implemented “in order to clarify that part 1143 is not intended to prevent tobacco product manufacturers from including truthful, non-misleading warnings on their products’ packaging or advertisements voluntarily
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 2, 2016 19:52
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines