Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,397 headlines found

22 Views

USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. DOCKET 12/27/16-10/5/17

10/04/2017 6226 ORDER granting 6225 the consent motion for scheduling order; the parties shall submit an agreed upon (proposed) superseding consent order for websites and onserts on or before October 23, 2017. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on October 4
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 6, 2017 05:02
20 Views

USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. #6227: ORDER #[72] -Remand: SECOND SUPERSEDING CONSENT ORDER IMPLEMENTING THE CORRECTIVE STATEMENTS

The corrective statements remedy under Order #1015…is hereby MODIFIED as set forth below:...A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA1 to make this statement about the health effects of smoking.
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 6, 2017 04:54
27 Views

USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. #6223-6: (Proposed) ORDER # ___ -Remand SECOND SUPERSEDING CONSENT ORDER IMPLEMENTING THE CORRECTIVE STATEMENTS REMEDY FOR NEWSPAPERS AND TELEVISION

A. Adverse Health Effects of Smoking A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA1 to make this statement about the health effects of smoking. • Smoking kills, on average, 1,200 Americans. Every day. • Mor
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 3, 2017 16:57
8 Views

USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. #6225: CONSENT MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING CORRECTIVE STATEMENTS

On this day, the parties are submitting a motion for entry of a proposed consent order regarding implementation of the corrective statements remedy for newspapers and television. That proposed consent order also incorporates the English and Spanish text
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 3, 2017 16:12
5 Views

USA v PHILIP MORRIS, et. al. #6223: CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SECOND SUPERSEDING CONSENT ORDER IMPLEMENTING THE CORRECTIVE STATEMENTS…

the present (proposed) Newspaper and TV Consent Order provides that if the Court adopts the (proposed) Newspaper and TV Order without modification, then the tobacco companies will not challenge that Order on appeal, and the specific implementation executi
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 3, 2017 16:05
10 Views

[Florida] R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant-Petitioner, v. PAUL R. LARKIN, JR., AND CARYN O. NEWBORN, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Carole A. Larkin: PETITIONER’S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION (PDF)

This Court should grant review to overturn the Third District’s naked defiance of Aubin’s square holding and ensure that Florida courts abide by that decision’s explicit rejection of the “reasonable alternative design” test.
Amazon CloudFront
added Oct 10, 2017 03:20
8 Views

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JAMES LEWIS, Respondent: On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Florida District Court Of Appeal For The Fifth District

2. Are strict-liability and negligence claims based on the findings by the class-action jury in Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc. preempted by the many federal statutes that manifested Congress’s intent that cigarettes continue to be lawfully sold in the
Jones Day
added Mar 18, 2018 02:28
12 Views

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SHARON BLOCK, as personal representative of Lillian Kaplan, deceased, Respondent: On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Florida District Court of Appeal for the Fourth District

1. When there is no way to tell whether a prior jury found particular facts against a party, does due process permit those facts to be conclusively pre- sumed against that party in subsequent litigation? 2. Are strict-liability and negligence claims
Jones Day
added Mar 18, 2018 02:31
12 Views

[Florida, Michigan] PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendants/Appellants, vs. MARY HOWLES, Plaintiff/Appellee: APPELLEE’S ANSWER BRIEF (PDF)

A. Defendants Seriously Misstate and Ignore the Evidence Which Supported the Jury’s Compensatory Damage Award. PM and RJR state the compensatory damage award in this case is “grossly excessive” because it was more than “necessary” to compensate M
Fourth District Court of Appeal / State of Florida
added Mar 7, 2018 04:21
26 Views

[Florida] PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. AND R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO Co., Petitioners, V. JAMES HARRIS LOURIE: PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI (PDF)

This Court is the only forum that can provide petitioners with re­lief from the unconstitutional procedures that have now been endorsed by both the Florida Supreme Court and the en bane Eleventh Circuit. Almost 200 progeny cases have been tri
Amazon CloudFront
added Sep 29, 2017 17:33
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines