Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,309 headlines found

18 Views

Russo vs. Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds: An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County (PDF)

wherein the estate maintained an addiction to cigarettes containing nicotine was a legal cause of plaintiff’s disease and death. Finding no merit to the claims of error raised, we affirm the final judgment and therefore find no need to and do not, address
Amazon CloudFront
added Oct 20, 2016 16:59
17 Views

[Cuba, Spain, Florida] Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. Philip Morris USA Inc. (PDF)

Morris’s position was that Vila’s laryngeal cancer was caused by the human papillomavirus, not by smoking cigarettes, but if smoking cigarettes did cause Vila’s cancer, then it was not caused by smoking cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris
Amazon CloudFront
added Oct 13, 2016 23:04
4 Views

DOCKET for CEI v DOT 4/28-10/12/16

CLERK’S ORDER filed granting petitioners’ unopposed motion to extend time to file the reply brief, The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: PETITIONER Reply Brief due 11/04/2016. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 11/14/2016. Final Briefs due 11/28/2016
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 12, 2016 19:10
47 Views

DOCKET for NICOPURE LABS v. FDA et al, Oct 11, 2016

Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Amy Berman Jackson: Motions Hearing held on 10/11/2016 re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NICOPURE LABS, LLC; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, ET AL., 44 MOTI
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 11, 2016 21:54
6 Views

[UK, Maryland, Pennsylvania] CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS (PDF)

CERTIORARI DENIED...15-1299 R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO, ET AL. V. KANE, ATT'Y GEN. OF PA
Supreme Court of the United States
added Oct 11, 2016 15:47
3 Views

CEI v DOT: BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS, Oct 7, 2016

To protect airline passengers from secondhand exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, the final rule clarifies that the use of e-cigarettes on aircraft constitutes “smoking” within the meaning of the statutory ban on smoking on aircraft. The final rule is a rea
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 12, 2016 19:37
3 Views

FORSYTH v MPAA: DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION, Oct 6, 2016

On September 29, 2016, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in In re Tam...The question presented by the petition is “Whether the disparagement provision in [the Lanham Act] is facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.”
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 7, 2016 04:08
4 Views

RICHARD VILLARREAL v. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY PINSTRIPE INC United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

And we conclude that Villarreal is not entitled to equitable tolling of his claim of disparate treatment because he admitted facts that establish that he did not diligently pursue his rights. We affirm in part and remand for the panel to address the remai
Findlaw
added Nov 7, 2016 18:28
14 Views

[Massachusetts] Health Groups v. FDA: COMPLAINT (PDF)

plaintiffs ask that the Court: (1) Declare the FDA to be in violation of the Tobacco Control Act; (2) Issue an order under § 706(1) of the APA or a writ of mandamus to compel the FDA to submit for the Court’s review a proposed timetable for expedited rule
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
added Oct 4, 2016 16:20
3 Views

[Australia] Johnson v Cancer Council of Victoria (Review and Regulation) [2016] VCAT 1596

For the reasons given, I find that the disclosure of Document 1 would divulge information communicated in confidence by or on behalf of a person to the Council, and the disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest by reason that
Australasian Legal Information Institute
added Sep 28, 2016 10:16
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines