Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,404 headlines found

8 Views

[Florida] R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant/Defendant v. ALAN KONZELMAN, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF ELEANOR KONZELMAN, Appellee/Plaintiff, INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT (PDF)

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT REFUSED TO APPLY FLORIDA’S BAR AGAINST SUCCESSIVE AWARDS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES BASED ON THE SAME CONDUCT / II. REYNOLDS IS ENTITLED TO A SUBSTANTIAL REMITTITUR OR A NEW TRIAL ON COMPENSATORY DAMAGES / III. REYNOLDS PRES
Amazon CloudFront
added Apr 18, 2018 13:48
7 Views

[Nebraska] HO-CHUNK, INC. et al v. LYNCH et al: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

Plaintiffs, tribal-owned corporations engaged in the distribution of cigarettes, seek a declaration clarifying whether certain recordkeeping requirements of the Contraband Cigarettes Trafficking Act apply to Indian tribal entities like them. The Court c
Justia
added May 27, 2017 17:25
8 Views

RICHARD M. VILLARREAL, Petitioner, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., ET AL., Respondents: On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN OPPOSITION

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) is modeled after Title VII, except that it substitutes age for the other protected categories. Like Title VII, the ADEA prohibits both disparate- treatment and disparate-impact forms of discrimination
Jones Day
added Mar 18, 2018 02:33
5 Views

[Florida] ARCHVIE: THERESA GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Defendants-Appellants (PDF) (243pp)

They argue that giving the Engle findings preclusive effect violates the Due Process Clauses...Because we reaffirm our holding in Walker and conclude that federal law does not preempt the Engle jury findings, we affirm the judgments against R.J. Reynol
SCOTUSBlog
added Jan 9, 2018 22:17
21 Views

[Florida] Theresa Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al.: En Banc Opinion (PDF) (248pp)

would have us presume that Congress established a right to sell cigarettes based on a handful of federal labeling requirements...We discern no “clear and manifest purpose” to displace tort liability... We AFFIRM the judgments against R.J. Reynolds and Phi
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit
added May 18, 2017 16:49
8 Views

JW v HHS Electronic Cigarettes Complaint 0831

Defendant has failed to: (i) produce the requested records or demonstrate that the requested records are lawfully exempt from production; (ii) notify Plaintiff of the scope of any responsive records Defendant intends to produce or withhold and the reas
Judicial Watch
added May 5, 2017 18:23
29 Views

[Florida] LETTER: RE: Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 13-14590 (PDF)

Dear Mr. Smith:...The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta has no bearing on any live issue before this Court...Marotta rejected the preemption theory that Appellants abandoned here and adds nothing to the due process c
Amazon CloudFront
added May 3, 2017 20:13
15 Views

USA v. Philip Morris, et. al. Appeal: J U D G M E N T, April 25, 2017

it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in these causes be affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the case be remanded for further proceedings, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.
Tobacco On Trial
added Jun 20, 2017 20:31
10 Views

USA v. PHILIP MORRIS, et. al.: Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. (PDF)

we see no reason why extensive proceedings will be required in the district court. With the minor revisions mandated in this opinion, the district court can simply issue an order requiring the corrected statements remedy to go forward.
US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
added Apr 26, 2017 02:32
27 Views

[Florida] RICHARD BOATRIGHT and DEBORAH BOATRIGHT, his wife, Appellants, v PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., and LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, Appellees. (PDF)

We reverse the order of the trial court and remand for an award of attorneys' fees and costs in favor of the Boatrights. The amount of the award is to be determined by the trial court. The court's award of costs to the Boatrights pursuant to section 57
Florida  Second District  Court Of Appeal
added Apr 12, 2017 21:06
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines