Headlines Tagged with Court Documents — 1,414 headlines found
Enrolled members of federally recognized Indian tribes, as United States citizens, are subject to federal taxation unless explicitly exempted under federal law or by treaty. Fry v. United States, 557 F.2d 646, 647 (9th Cir. 1977). King Mountain is not exe
Feb 11, 2013 Leagle
added Feb 15, 2013 11:32
the foreperson asked to speak with the judge about something “wrong” that occurred during the trial. The plaintiff seeks to pervert the purpose of the rule to prevent any inquiry into potential misconduct...The petition for writ of certiorari is denied
Mar 19, 2014 Fourth District Court of Appeal / State of Florida
added Mar 20, 2014 13:11
Considering the nature of Respondent's serious misconduct, Respondent's prior discipline, the absence of relevant mitigating factors and the legal precedent, this Panel recommends Respondent be disbarred.
Aug 9, 2012 Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Ilinois (ARDC)
added Aug 17, 2012 03:22
Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
Feb 27, 2014 Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 19, 2014 15:16
Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Amy Berman Jackson: Motions Hearing held on 10/11/2016 re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NICOPURE LABS, LLC; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, ET AL., 44 MOTI
Oct 11, 2016 Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 11, 2016 21:54
unlike in both Marotta and Intramed, where we held that improper comments were not harmless when viewed in conjunction with other preserved evidentiary errors, the Tobacco Companies have not established the presence of any additional errors in the trial.
Aug 7, 2013 Fourth District Court of Appeal / State of Florida
added Aug 7, 2013 20:39
DOES ACCEPTING AS RES JUDICATA THE EIGHT PHASE I FINDINGS APPROVED IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT GROUP, INC., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006), VIOLATE THE [ENGLE DEFENDANTS’] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
Mar 14, 2013 Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 14, 2013 14:59
A History of the Knowledge—and Ignorance—of Harms from Cigarettes in Canada, 1950-2000 - Expert Report submitted by Robert N. Proctor, Stanford University (PDF) [GO TO https://tobacco.asp.visard.ca/Main.htm, click on blue bar for access]
I have been asked to evaluate and comment on three expert reports . . . 1. All three fail to consult the tobacco industry‘s internal documents, which reveal a decades-long conspiracy to downplay the hazards of smoking.
Aug 19, 2011 Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé (Quebec Council on Tobacco and Health) (ca)
added Nov 27, 2012 13:07
USA v. PHILIP MORRIS, et. al.: Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (PDF)
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. . . . The district court did not clearly err when it found the defendants were reasonably likely to commit future RICO violations despite the passage of the Tobacco Control Act. Nor did the court abuse its dis
Jul 27, 2012 US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
added Jul 27, 2012 12:33
NICOPURE v FDA: SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to Respond to the Court’s October 26, 2016 by FDA, Nov 1, 2016
If an NFL is not a “tobacco product”—that is, if it is not made or derived from tobacco and does not meet the definition of a “component or part”—then it is not subject to the deeming rule, and a premarket application is not required. Thus, the FDA does
Nov 1, 2016 Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 2, 2016 21:48