Headlines Tagged with Court Documents — 1,396 headlines found
Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
Feb 27, 2014 Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 19, 2014 15:16
Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Amy Berman Jackson: Motions Hearing held on 10/11/2016 re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NICOPURE LABS, LLC; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, ET AL., 44 MOTI
Oct 11, 2016 Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 11, 2016 21:54
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOBACCO OUTLETS v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND: APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
contends that the Price Ordinance violates the First Amendment and that both ordinances are preempted by federal and state law. The district court held that the ordinances were neither preempted nor otherwise invalid. We affirm.
Sep 30, 2013 US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
added Oct 1, 2013 00:58
unlike in both Marotta and Intramed, where we held that improper comments were not harmless when viewed in conjunction with other preserved evidentiary errors, the Tobacco Companies have not established the presence of any additional errors in the trial.
Aug 7, 2013 Fourth District Court of Appeal / State of Florida
added Aug 7, 2013 20:39
DOES ACCEPTING AS RES JUDICATA THE EIGHT PHASE I FINDINGS APPROVED IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT GROUP, INC., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006), VIOLATE THE [ENGLE DEFENDANTS’] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
Mar 14, 2013 Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 14, 2013 14:59
Considering the nature of Respondent's serious misconduct, Respondent's prior discipline, the absence of relevant mitigating factors and the legal precedent, this Panel recommends Respondent be disbarred.
Aug 9, 2012 Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Ilinois (ARDC)
added Aug 17, 2012 03:22
A History of the Knowledge—and Ignorance—of Harms from Cigarettes in Canada, 1950-2000 - Expert Report submitted by Robert N. Proctor, Stanford University (PDF) [GO TO https://tobacco.asp.visard.ca/Main.htm, click on blue bar for access]
I have been asked to evaluate and comment on three expert reports . . . 1. All three fail to consult the tobacco industry‘s internal documents, which reveal a decades-long conspiracy to downplay the hazards of smoking.
Aug 19, 2011 Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé (Quebec Council on Tobacco and Health) (ca)
added Nov 27, 2012 13:07
Feb 12, 2008 California Courts (Judicial Council of California)
added Feb 12, 2008 00:00
NICOPURE v FDA: SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to Respond to the Court’s October 26, 2016 by FDA, Nov 1, 2016
If an NFL is not a “tobacco product”—that is, if it is not made or derived from tobacco and does not meet the definition of a “component or part”—then it is not subject to the deeming rule, and a premarket application is not required. Thus, the FDA does
Nov 1, 2016 Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 2, 2016 21:48
[Florida] SOFFER. vs. R.J. REYNOLDS: ARE MEMBERS OF THE CLASS IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT...ENTITLED TO PURSUE AN AWARD OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES UNDER THEORIES OF NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY? (PDF)
Considered in light of the supreme court’s decision to allow Engle progeny plaintiffs to “initiate individual damages actions,” one simply cannot infer that the supreme court intended to place a limitation upon progeny plaintiffs’ ability to pursue pu
Mar 17, 2016 Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 17, 2016 17:03