Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,325 headlines found

50 Views

[Florida] R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. JIMMIE LEE BROWN, etc., Respondent. (PDF)

Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 19, 2014 15:16
47 Views

DOCKET for NICOPURE LABS v. FDA et al, Oct 11, 2016

Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Amy Berman Jackson: Motions Hearing held on 10/11/2016 re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NICOPURE LABS, LLC; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, ET AL., 44 MOTI
Tobacco On Trial
added Oct 11, 2016 21:54
47 Views

[Florida] PM USA, Lorillard and Liggett v. Tullo (PDF)

unlike in both Marotta and Intramed, where we held that improper comments were not harmless when viewed in conjunction with other preserved evidentiary errors, the Tobacco Companies have not established the presence of any additional errors in the trial.
Fourth District Court of Appeal / State of Florida
added Aug 7, 2013 20:39
47 Views

[Florida] PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Petitioner, vs. JAMES L. DOUGLAS, etc., Respondent.

DOES ACCEPTING AS RES JUDICATA THE EIGHT PHASE I FINDINGS APPROVED IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT GROUP, INC., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006), VIOLATE THE [ENGLE DEFENDANTS’] DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 14, 2013 14:59
46 Views

A History of the Knowledge—and Ignorance—of Harms from Cigarettes in Canada, 1950-2000 - Expert Report submitted by Robert N. Proctor, Stanford University (PDF) [GO TO https://tobacco.asp.visard.ca/Main.htm, click on blue bar for access]

I have been asked to evaluate and comment on three expert reports . . . 1. All three fail to consult the tobacco industry‘s internal documents, which reveal a decades-long conspiracy to downplay the hazards of smoking.
Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé (Quebec Council on Tobacco and Health) (ca)
added Nov 27, 2012 13:07
45 Views

[Cuba, Illinois] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING BOARD

Considering the nature of Respondent's serious misconduct, Respondent's prior discipline, the absence of relevant mitigating factors and the legal precedent, this Panel recommends Respondent be disbarred.
Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Ilinois (ARDC)
added Aug 17, 2012 03:22
44 Views

NICOPURE v FDA: SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to Respond to the Court’s October 26, 2016 by FDA, Nov 1, 2016

If an NFL is not a “tobacco product”—that is, if it is not made or derived from tobacco and does not meet the definition of a “component or part”—then it is not subject to the deeming rule, and a premarket application is not required. Thus, the FDA does
Tobacco On Trial
added Nov 2, 2016 21:48
44 Views

[Florida] SOFFER. vs. R.J. REYNOLDS: ARE MEMBERS OF THE CLASS IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT...ENTITLED TO PURSUE AN AWARD OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES UNDER THEORIES OF NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY? (PDF)

Considered in light of the supreme court’s decision to allow Engle progeny plaintiffs to “initiate individual damages actions,” one simply cannot infer that the supreme court intended to place a limitation upon progeny plaintiffs’ ability to pursue pu
Supreme Court of Florida
added Mar 17, 2016 17:03
44 Views

DOCKET for USA v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, et al May 12-May 14, 2015

05/19/2015 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gladys Kessler: Motion Hearing held on 5/19/2015 re 6142 Unopposed MOTION for Order Authorizing Transfer of Certain Cigarette Brands and Businesses to ITG Brands, LLC, Pursuant to Order #1015, Para
Tobacco On Trial
added May 20, 2015 23:52
44 Views

[Canada] SCC Case Information - Summary: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen

The Tax Court judge concluded that the duty on the applicant’s tobacco products became payable pursuant to paragraph 42(1)(a) of the Act when these products were packaged for sale to Indians, and he consequently dismissed the appeals from the Minister’s a
Supreme Court of Canada
added Mar 28, 2013 18:54
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines