Sort by: Date added | Date Published | Most Viewed

Headlines Tagged with Court Documents 1,420 headlines found

8 Views

[Florida] ELIZABETH MARSH, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF MINNIE FORD and MINNIE FORD, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., Appellee. (PDF)

Under the supreme court’s Schoeff decision, the plaintiff’s compensatory damage award is not subject to a reduction for comparative negligence. Id. We therefore reverse and remand the case to the trial court for reinstatement of the jury’s verdict.
Amazon CloudFront
added Dec 7, 2018 19:50
12 Views

IRIMI, Petitioner, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., ET AL., Respondents: AMICUS BRIEF OF THE FLORIDA DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS

Thus, the decision under review must be affirmed in any event. Any other result would deny defendants a right to question potential jurors and deny them a right to a fair trial.
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 30, 2018 22:29
11 Views

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, vs. NEWHERE INC., a California Corportation; VAPECO DISTRIBUTION LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND, DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS (PDF)

For years, Defendants have been using their popular social media accounts to glamorize the use of electronic cigarettes (also known as vaping) and to target youth. Using the same marketing techniques that big tobacco used a generation ago, Defendants' web
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2018 23:11
7 Views

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. KANDYPENS INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants: COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND CIVIL PENALTIES (PDF)

For years, Kandypens has been using celebrity endorsements, product placement in music videos, and stylized photos on social media accounts to glamorize and popularize the vaping of highly addictive, flavored, liquid nicotine (“e-liquids”) and marijuana
Amazon CloudFront
added Nov 5, 2018 23:04
7 Views

UNICE NEELEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity; STANTON GLANTZ, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive; Defendants. (PDF)

1. This is an action for damages brought by Plaintiff EUNICE NEELEY (hereinafter “NEELEY” or “PLAINTIFF”) against Defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (hereinafter “REGENTS” or “DEFENDANT”), STANTON GLANTZ (hereinafter “GLANTZ” or “D
The Armstrong Law Firm
added Oct 17, 2018 02:39
5 Views

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS (PDF)

alleging causes of action for (I) FEHA hostile work environment - sexual harassment, (2) FEHA retaliation, (3) FEHA failure to prevent harassment and retaliation, (4) negligent retention of an unfit employee, (5) breach of contract, (6) unjust enrichment,
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (UCSF)
added Oct 17, 2018 02:35
11 Views

STARBUCK, Plaintiff, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., Defendants: MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF INVOKING SECTION 768.73(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (DOC. 314) AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE (DOC. 324)(PDF)

That means that the Defendants' previous payments of punitive damage awards does not shield them from paying further punitive damages here (were a jury so to conclude).
Amazon CloudFront
added Oct 5, 2018 01:31
8 Views

[Florida] GWENDOLYN E. ODOM, etc., Petitioner, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Respondent.

we quash the decision of the Fourth District and remand with instructions to reinstate the final judgment. We also disapprove Webb and Putney to the extent they are inconsistent with this opinion. Finally, we award Odom attorney’s fees for the appeal o
Amazon CloudFront
added Sep 21, 2018 21:50
17 Views

[Florida] HAREWOOD v REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Individually and as successor by merger to BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, individually and as Successor by merger to THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY: VERDICT (PDF)

Was Glenn Simmons addicted to cigarettes manufactured by Brown & Williamson containing nicotine, and, if so, was such an addiction a legal cause of his oral cavity cancer? Yes - - /- - No - - - - If your answer to Question 1 was NO, you should
Amazon CloudFront
added Sep 20, 2018 22:48
11 Views

[Florida] Elsa Chacon, etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. Philip Morris USA, Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant: An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge. (PDF)

Satisfying either Florida citizenship or Florida residency is sufficient to allow a plaintiff to then proceed to prove the timing of the manifestation or diagnosis of the smoking-related illness in relation to the Engle class membership cutoff date of
Amazon CloudFront
added Sep 14, 2018 18:33
Sign up for daily headlines All Headlines Featured Headlines U.S. Headlines International Headlines