<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Tobacco Articles: lawsuit williamson</title>
<link>http://www.tobacco.org/newsfeed/lawsuit/williamson.rss</link>
<description>Latest top tobacco news headlines</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Pre-Gaming the Supremes&#226;&#8364;&#8482; Big Punitive Damages Case</title>
<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/10/26/pre-gaming-the-supremes-big-punitive-damages-case/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobacco.org/news/235135.html</guid>
<description>
Corporations might be careful what they ask for: It&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s hard to divine how the new guys will vote on this issue, which has no clear ideological lines. As &#226;&#8364;&#339;strict constructionists,&#226;&#8364;&#157; Justices Scalia and Thomas have refused to go along with rulings that set caps because they don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t see where the Constitution protects against &#226;&#8364;&#339;excessive punitive damages.&#226;&#8364;&#157; Joining Scalia and Thomas is Justice Ginsburg, who also opposes caps. A worst-case scenario for Big Business would have Roberts and Alito agreeing with Scalia, Thomas, and Ginsburg, creating a five-justice majority that could allow for larger punitive damages verdicts.

In today&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s New York Times, Adam Cohen calls the State Farm and BMW rulings &#226;&#8364;&#339;remarkably &#226;&#8364;&#732;activist&#226;&#8364;&#8482; by all the traditional measures&#226;&#8364;&#157; because they take the &#226;&#8364;&#339;due process&#226;&#8364;&#157; clause and &#226;&#8364;&#339;translate it into a right that is not at all apparent from the words&#226;&#8364;&#8482; plain meaning.&#226;&#8364;&#157; The case, writes Cohen, &#226;&#8364;&#339;will tell us a lot about the John Roberts court, which may be the most pro-business court in decades.&#226;&#8364;&#157;</description>
<source url="http://blogs.wsj.com/">Wall Street Journal Blogs</source>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ill Fort Lauderdale man tackling Big Tobacco on his own</title>
<link>http://www.newsobserver.com/ncwire/news/Story/234851p-226032c.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobacco.org/news/51693.html</guid>
<description>Larry Williamson wants tobacco companies to pay him $15 million for his lung disease that stemmed from 51 years of smoking.

And he plans on doing so without an attorney, alone in his plaid button-down shirt on one side of the courtroom, facing well-dressed, well-paid tobacco attorneys at the defense table on the other side.

Williamson, 62, is representing himself in Broward County Circuit Court against tobacco giants R.J. Reynolds, Philip Morris, Brown &amp; Williamson and supermarket chain Winn-Dixie for &quot;ruining his life,&quot; he said.

&quot;I have a 100 percent chance of winning,&quot; said Williamson, who quit smoking two years ago.</description>
<source url="http://www.news-observer.com/">Raleigh  News &amp; Observer</source>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
