<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Tobacco Articles: lawsuit cocca</title>
<link>http://www.tobacco.org/newsfeed/lawsuit/cocca.rss</link>
<description>Latest top tobacco news headlines</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Arizona judge rejects light cigarette smokers class bid</title>
<link>http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010726/n26349216.html</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/71423.html</guid>
<description>An Arizona state court judge rejected an effort to certify a consumer fraud class action lawsuit on behalf of smokers who purchased ``light'' cigarettes made by Philip Morris U.S.A., the company said on Thursday.

Plaintiffs in the so-called ``Cocca Case'' wanted the court to order refunds of the money smokers spent to buy their cigarettes, Philip Morris U.S.A., the domestic cigarette unit of Philip Morris Cos. Inc. (NYSE:MO).

The plaintiffs alleged that Philip Morris U.S.A. fraudulently marketed light and ultra-light cigarettes by implying that they are healthier than regular cigarettes, the company said. . .

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Roger Kaufman cited four reasons why the Cocca case failed to meet legal requirements for a class action and said any of the four was sufficient enough to justify the denial, according to Philip Morris, whose brands include Marlboro and Virginia Slims.</description>
<source url="http://www.reuters.com/">Reuters</source>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>