<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Tobacco Articles: lawsuit bowles</title>
<link>http://www.tobacco.org/newsfeed/lawsuit/bowles.rss</link>
<description>Latest top tobacco news headlines</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>BOWLES v. CANTON PTY LTD (trading as TIEN TIEN CAF&#201; BAR) DECISION OF MAGISTRATES&#8217; COURT OF VICTORIA &#8211;  13 SEPTEMBER 2000</title>
<link>http://www.smokefreeair.org/lib/libdet.cfm?id=319</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/52236.html</guid>
<description>The plaintiff, Andrea Bowles, an asthmatic, attended the Tien Tien restaurant in August 1998.  Another member of her party had earlier made a telephone reservation, stipulating that their table was to be in the non-smoking section of the restaurant. 

Ms Bowles and her party were seated at a table on the border between the smoking and non-smoking areas of the restaurant, as designated that evening.  Between 10 and 12 people were smoking within about 2 metres of where Ms Bowles was sitting.  . . 

The Magistrate held that the evidence &#8220;establishes a clear causal connection between the restaurant conditions and the illness of the plaintiff over the following six to eight weeks&#8221;.  He found the restaurant liable on three separate grounds &#8211; breach of contract; breach of duty of care in negligence; and occupiers liability.  He reduced the award of damages by 30% for contributory negligence by Ms Bowles.</description>
<source url="http://www.smokefreeair.org/">Smokescreen Action Network</source>
<dc:coverage>Australia</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>