<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Tobacco Articles: category pregnancy</title>
<link>http://www.tobacco.org/newsfeed/category/pregnancy.rss</link>
<description>Latest top tobacco news headlines</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Seventy per cent of Bulgarian smokers wanted to quit, survey says </title>
<link>http://sofiaecho.com/2009/11/19/818567_seventy-per-cent-of-bulgarian-smokers-wanted-to-quit-survey-says</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/293035.html</guid>
<description>More than 70 per cent of smokers in Bulgaria wanted to give up smoking, Yulia Medichkova of the Greenwild Foundation was quoted by Bulgarian news agency BTA as saying on November 19 2009.

Medichkova presented the results of a one-year campaign entitled The Culture of Breathing. Over 50 per cent of Bulgarians approved of increased restrictions on smoking that will be introduced by mid-2010. Bulgaria ranks third in the world in terms of number of smokers, after Japan and Greece, Medichkova said.

What was more worrying, according to another survey released by the Health Ministry on November 17 2009, was that every second pregnant woman in Bulgaria smoked during pregnancy.</description>
<source url="http://www.sofiaecho.com/">Sofia Echo </source>
<author>web@sofiaecho.com</author>
<dc:coverage>Bulgaria</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Massachusetts&#039; &#039;Model&#039; Tobacco Cessation Benefit Spurs Unprecedented Drop in Smoking Rates, Heart Attacks, Asthma, and Birth Complications</title>
<link>http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/massachusetts-model-tobacco-cessation-benefit-spurs-unprecedented-drop-in-smoking-rates-heart-attacks-asthma-and-birth-complications-70401442.html</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292940.html</guid>
<description>A &quot;model&quot; tobacco cessation benefit offered to Massachusetts&#039; Medicaid participants has produced an astounding 26% drop in smoking rates in only two and a half years, and has already been linked to decreases in heart attacks, hospitalizations for asthma and COPD, and a significant decrease in birth complications.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program (MTCP) found that up to 38% fewer MassHealth cessation benefit users were hospitalized for heart attacks in the first year after using the benefit, and that 18% fewer benefit users visited the emergency room for asthma symptoms in the first year after using the benefit. Researchers also found that there were 12% fewer claims for adverse maternal birth complications since the benefit was implemented.

The Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services said more than 75,000 people -- a full 40% of MassHealth members who smoke -- have used the benefit to try to quit smoking. Cost savings are being studied, and all indications suggest they will be significant.

&quot;It is clear from these latest findings that the Commonwealth&#039;s efforts to help people quit smoking is a sound investment,&quot; Executive Office of Health and Human Services Secretary JudyAnn Bigby said.  . . .


&quot;As the nation debates the future of its health care system, the national significance of this research cannot be understated,&quot; said Robert J. Gould, PhD, President and CEO of Partnership for Prevention, a national organization that advances policies and practices to prevent disease and improve the health of all Americans. &quot;These findings demonstrate that prudent investments in preventive health today will have a dramatic and positive effect on our health care system tomorrow.&quot;</description>
<source url="http://www.prnewswire.com">PR Newswire</source>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>&#8216;Baby and Me&#8217; program provides incentives for mothers to quit smoking</title>
<link>http://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/2009/nov/14/baby-and-me-program-provides-incentives-mothers-qu/</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292655.html</guid>
<description>This fall, six women graduated from &#8220;Baby and Me &#8212;&#65533;Tobacco Free,&#8221; a program to keep women from smoking during and after pregnancy.

Funded by a grant and led locally by Hope Cook, the prenatal coordinator for the North&#65533;west Colorado Visiting Nurse Association, the program gives expecting and new moms incentive and motivation to quit smoking and stay smoke-free.

Missy Chotvacs was one of Cook&#8217;s fall graduates. She learned about the program through other VNA services. Chotvacs, 21, quit her 1 1/2-year smoking habit when she learned she was pregnant and has been smoke-free since. Her daughter, Mya Chotvacs Chase, is 13 months old.

Potential hazards to child development, keeping second-hand smoke away from her daughter and cutting the expense of cigarettes from a single parent&#8217;s budget were among Chotvacs&#8217; reasons for entering and completing the program, she said.

During the program, participants get a monthly carbon dioxide screening,</description>
<source url="http://www.steamboatpilot.com/">Steamboat Pilot </source>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title> &#039;Smoke Free for Baby and Me&#039; campaign to raise awareness of health benefits of quitting smoking</title>
<link>http://www.maconnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=5834&amp;Itemid=136</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292307.html</guid>
<description>

November is &quot;The Great American Smokeout Month&quot; and the Macon County Public Health Center is supporting a campaign to raise awareness of the immediate health benefits of quitting smoking with pregnant women and mothers with young children.

Stopping smoking is probably the single most effective step a pregnant woman can take to improve her own health and that of her baby, according to the Centers for Disease Control director. If you are pregnant and smoke:

-- You double the chances that your child will be born with a low birth weight.</description>
<source url="http://www.maconnews.com/">Macon County News &amp; Shopping Guide </source>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ingrid Newkirk: Using Dollar Bills to Light Cigarettes</title>
<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ingrid-newkirk/using-dollar-bills-to-lig_b_8764.html</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292254.html</guid>
<description>
With the national debt in the trillions, the U.S. government is still letting money go up in smoke.

For decades now, we&#8217;ve known that those men in the white coats who were employed by tobacco companies to appear on TV and tell us that smoking soothed a scratchy throat were not telling us the whole truth. In the 1970s, epidemiology conclusively linked smoking in pregnant women to fetal harm. Since then, every medical organization, the U.S. Surgeon General, and even tobacco companies themselves have advised us to stay away from the smokes, and most strongly warned that women should not smoke during pregnancy.

The federal government, meanwhile, is still funding studies in which stressed monkeys are locked inside metal cages, impregnated, and injected with nicotine; have their babies taken away from them after birth; have lung function tests performed on them; and are then killed. And should you think this is the government foolishly trying to prove for the umpteenth time what we already know - in this case about tobacco and nicotine - it is not. It is to see if women can keep on smoking and have babies too! . . .


The money is considerable. Spindel&#8217;s recent NIH grants include $1.3 million to test fetal nicotine exposure in rhesus monkeys, $1.8 million to study the mechanisms that nicotine uses to harm the fetuses of mutant mice, and his share of the $11 million annual support grant for the primate center. Meanwhile, only three states&#8212;Maine, Delaware, and Mississippi&#8212;fund tobacco prevention programs at the minimum levels recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia fund such programs at less than half the CDC minimum or provide no state funding at all.

The expense is not only borne by us taxpayers and the animals who pay with their lives in such disgusting tests, but by the women and children who are ill served by foolish funding priorities.
</description>
<source url="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">Huffington Post </source>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title> Smoking mums have &#039;problem kids&#039;</title>
<link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8339014.stm</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292082.html</guid>
<description>
Smoking during pregnancy significantly increases the risk of having a child with behavioural problems, according to UK and US researchers.

Writing in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, they say the problems can be evident in children as young as three years old.

They believe smoking in pregnancy may damage the developing structure of the baby&#039;s brain.

One expert said it was another strong reason for mothers to give up smoking.

The researchers from the universities of York, Hull and Illinois looked at more than 14,000 mother and child pairs who were taking part in the Millennium Cohort Study.
</description>
<source url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/">BBC Online</source>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Smoking while pregnant linked to behavioural problems in children :  Developing structure and function of the foetal brain at risk, research suggests  </title>
<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/nov/03/smoking-pregnancy-child-behavioural-problems</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292071.html</guid>
<description>
Smoking during pregnancy significantly increases the risk of having a child with behavioural problems, according to research published today. Disturbances can manifest themselves in children as young as three years old, the study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health claims.

The findings are based on more than 14,000 mother-and-child pairs drawn from the millennium cohort study, a population-based study of children born between 2000 and 2001 whose families are receiving child benefit.

The research was carried out by Professor Kate Pickett, at the department of health sciences at Hull York medical school, University of York.

Mothers, who were categorised as light or heavy smokers, depending on how many cigarettes they smoked every day during pregnancy, were asked to score their children&#039;s behaviour.</description>
<source url="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">The Guardian </source>
<author>editor@societyguardian.co.uk (* Owen Bowcott  * The Guardian, Tuesday 3 November 2009)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mums-to-be cut ciggies </title>
<link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/ireland/article6898082.ece</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292027.html</guid>
<description>The number of mothers who admit smoking during pregnancy has fallen by nearly 12%, according to a study at the Coombe hospital, Dublin.

The proportion dropped from just over 23% to just under 21%, less than the smoking rate in the general population, which was 27% last year, but still higher than in other countries. In Massachusetts, America, for example, only 7% of pregnant women admit to smoking.

&quot;When you compare the rates of smoking in pregnant women who attended the Coombe before and after the [smoking in public] ban, it&#039;s a significant reduction,&quot; said Luke Clancy, director-general of the Tobacco Free Research Institute (TFI).

&quot;We are not saying the ban necessarily caused it, but we hope it influenced them . . .


The survey was published in BJOG, an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
</description>
<source url="http://www.the-times.co.uk/">Times Of London </source>
<dc:coverage>Ireland</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study (FULL TEXT): BMJ 2009;339:b4347, doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4347 (Published 29 October 2009)  </title>
<link>http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/339/oct29_1/b4347</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/292011.html</guid>
<description>
In conclusion, reliance on self reporting to measure smoking during pregnancy significantly underestimates the number of pregnant smokers in Scotland, with more than 2400 unrecognised pregnant smokers a year who will not be offered smoking cessation services. Reliance on self reporting resulted in twice as many undetected smokers in the most deprived areas compared with the least deprived areas. Overall, these figures call for more accurate methods of identifying pregnant smokers, especially when such data are used to inform policy and provide patient care.

What is already known on this topic 


Self reported smoking during pregnancy is known to be an inaccurate method of identifying smokers Self reported smoking in Scotland is used to generate smoking prevalence and, largely, to target smoking cessation services

What this study adds 

Reliance on self reported smoking during pregnancy underestimates the true smoking prevalence in Scotland by 17% Each year in Scotland twice as many pregnant smokers from more deprived areas go undetected compared with pregnant smokers in the least deprived areas Reliance on self reporting results in a failure to detect over 2400 pregnant smokers each year in Scotland who are therefore not offered smoking cessation services
</description>
<source url="http://www.tobacco.org/media.php?mode=display&amp;media_id=8906">British Medical Journal</source>
<dc:coverage>UK-Scotland</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study</title>
<link>http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/oct29_1/b4347</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291978.html</guid>
<description>
Objective To determine what impact reliance on self reported smoking status during pregnancy has on both the accuracy of smoking prevalence figures and access to smoking cessation services for pregnant women in Scotland.
 . . .


Conclusion Reliance on self reporting to identify pregnant smokers significantly underestimates the number of pregnant smokers in Scotland and results in a failure to detect over 2400 smokers each year who are therefore not offered smoking cessation services.
</description>
<source url="http://www.tobacco.org/media.php?mode=display&amp;media_id=8906">British Medical Journal</source>
<dc:coverage>UK-Scotland</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Around One In Five Pregnant Smokers Go Undetected Each Year</title>
<link>http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/169221.php</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291977.html</guid>
<description>Self-reported smoking during pregnancy underestimates the true number of pregnant smokers in Scotland by 17%, and results in a failure to detect 2400 pregnant smokers each year, finds new research published on bmj.com today.

This results in thousands of smokers not being identified or offered smoking cessation services, say the authors.

It is well known that self reported smoking during pregnancy is an inaccurate way to identify smokers. Yet it is still used widely by antenatal clinics to determine the smoking status of pregnant women and to refer them to smoking cessation services. The Scottish Government also relies on self-reported smoking figures to set targets and measure the success of smoking cessation services. . . .


The authors estimate that the true smoking prevalence for pregnant women in Scotland, after adjusting for area deprivation, maternal age and self-reported smoking is 28%, higher than the 23% based on self report data.

They conclude by calling for more accurate methods of identifying pregnant smokers, so that accurate data is used to inform policy and provide appropriate 

Source British Medical Journal
</description>
<source url="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/">Medical News TODAY</source>
<dc:coverage>UK-Scotland</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mothers&#039; smoking causes newborn discomfort</title>
<link>http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2009/10/26/Mothers-smoking-causes-newborn-discomfort/UPI-52081256536448/</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291739.html</guid>
<description>French researchers say they have tied maternal smoking to an increased risk of discomfort in newborns.

The study, published in Biological Psychiatry, suggests significantly more discomfort among newborns of smoking mothers may be related to having less monoamine oxidase A an enzyme, which degrades chemicals involved in brain message-sending.

Monoamine oxidase A activity was reduced both in the pregnant smokers and in their newborns when the researchers tested for blood biomarkers of monoamine oxidase A activity in smoking and non-smoking pregnant women and in the cord blood of their newborns.

Smoke exposure-induced low monoamine oxidase A activity in the womb may affect fetus brain neurotransmission and create potential vulnerabilities to behavioral disorders later in life,</description>
<source url="http://www.upi.com/">UPI</source>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Reduced Monoamine Oxidase A Activity in Pregnant Smokers and in Their Newborns:  Volume 66, Issue 8, Pages 728-733 (15 October 2009)  </title>
<link>http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/bps/article/S0006-3223(09)00701-X/abstract</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291634.html</guid>
<description>
Background

Tobacco smoking is associated with reduced monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) activity. Smoking-associated low MAOA activities in pregnancy and in newborns may have negative perinatal and postnatal consequences. We aimed to compare, in everyday clinical conditions, biomarkers of MAOA activity in smoking (SPW) and lifetime nonsmoking pregnant women (NSPW) and in cord blood and to assess the newborns&#039; behavior during the first 48 hours of life.
 . . .


Conclusions

Smoking is associated with MAOA inhibition in pregnant women and in their newborns at birth. Further studies are needed to estimate the behavioral significance of these findings.</description>
<source url="http://www.tobacco.org/media.php?mode=display&amp;media_id=10024">Journal of Substance Abuse</source>
<author>ivan.berlin@psl.aphp.fr</author>
<dc:coverage>France</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Maternal Smoking May Increase Newborns&#039; Discomfort</title>
<link>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091021100738.htm</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291551.html</guid>
<description>A new research study being published in the October 15th issue of Biological Psychiatry suggests that maternal smoking may increase the level of distress of newborns.


Studies have consistently found that prenatal cigarette smoke exposure is associated with increased rates of behavior problems, irritability, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, the risk of violent offenses, conduct disorder, adolescent onset of drug dependence, and the risk for criminal arrest in offspring. This study adds another potential negative outcome to the list of reasons for mothers to stop smoking while pregnant.

Most of the effects of tobacco either during pregnancy or on postnatal outcomes are attributed to nicotine. However, smoking is associated with reduced monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) activity, enzymes that degrade brain neurotransmitters in smokers. Prenatal smoke exposure-induced low MAO-A activity in fetal life may dysregulate brain neurotransmission, creating a potential vulnerability to develop behavioral disorders later in life. This dysregulation can occur with or without interaction with nicotine&#039;s effect on the developing brain.</description>
<source url="http://www.sciencedaily.com">ScienceDaily</source>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Guangzhou To Ban Tobacco Sales To Vulnerable Groups </title>
<link>http://www.chinacsr.com/en/2009/10/16/6334-guangzhou-to-ban-tobacco-sales-to-vulnerable-groups/</link>
<guid>http://tobacco.org/news/291318.html</guid>
<description>
Guangzhou has prepared a tobacco control regulation which is pending approval by the city&#039;s National People&#039;s Congress standing committee.

The new regulation lists ten areas including hospitals, kindergartens, schools, and buses as tobacco-free areas and states that people smoking in these areas will be fined CNY50 and those who sell tobacco products to vulnerable groups such as teenagers and pregnant women will be fined CNY1,000.
 . . .


In addition, the regulation forbids tobacco manufacturers and sellers to send tobacco products as gifts</description>
<source url="http://www.chinacsr.com/">ChinaCSR.com </source>
<dc:coverage>China</dc:coverage>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>