Categories · International
· Lawsuits
· Court Documents
Lawsuits · Doj
Organizations · BAT
· Scotus
|
Jump to full article: SCOTUSBlog, 2010-07-23
Intro: On June 24, 2010, the same day the petition was conferenced, this Court issued its opinion in Morrison
v. National Australia Bank Ltd., No. 08-1191. As
explained below, Morrison thoroughly invalidates the
reasoning on which the D.C. Circuit based its holding
in this case – namely, that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et
seq. (RICO), reaches BATCo’s conduct outside the
United States under the so-called “effects” test.
Accordingly, the Court should grant rehearing, vacate the order denying certiorari, and enter a GVR order so that the D.C. Circuit may consider Morrison’s
impact in the first instance. . . .
BATCo’s certiorari petition presented the
following questions:
1. Whether the D.C. Circuit correctly held
* * * that the traditional presumption against
extraterritoriality is completely irrelevant to
determining whether Congress intends a statute to reach the wholly foreign conduct of a foreign
corporation, if such foreign conduct is alleged to
have had a direct and substantial effect within the
United States.
2. Whether the D.C. Circuit, in concluding that * * * RICO[] regulates petitioner’s wholly
foreign conduct, improperly (a) ignored the
presumption against extraterritoriality and
affirmative evidence that Congress never intended RICO to apply extraterritorially; (b) borrowed from federal securities and antitrust cases the ill-suited “effects” test as a measure of RICO’s
extraterritorial reach; (c) approved a watered-
down version of that test that conflicts with the
test used by other circuits; and (d) relied on the
U.S. “effects” of the U.S. conduct of other codefendants
and of the “overall” alleged RICO
scheme. . . .
CONCLUSION
The Court should grant the petition for rehearing,
vacate the order denying certiorari, and enter an order that grants the petition for certiorari, vacates the portion of the D.C. Circuit’s decision that
concerns the extraterritorial reach of RICO, and
remands for consideration of Morrison.
Jump to full article » |