Categories · Business (Tobacco)
· Teen Smoking/Youth
· Tobacco Control
· Advertising/Promos
· Op-Ed
· Business (General)
non-USA, by Country · UK
Organizations · Ash
|
Last month, Patrick Bashman and John Luik argued against a ban on tobacco display advertising . Here, the anti-tobacco lobby gives it's response. Jump to full article: Politics.co.uk (uk), 2009-11-07 Author: Amanda Sandford
Intro: There are many reasons why children take up smoking but youth exposure to tobacco marketing is a key factor. Although most forms of tobacco promotion were outlawed in the UK by the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002, the tobacco industry has continued to use its marketing muscle to lure children to its products through elaborate displays and fancy packaging. . . .
Naturally, the tobacco industry disputes the evidence because of its need to recruit and maintain new customers. The industry has an established track record of contesting research evidence to delay regulation. Tactics include challenging the evidence in order to create uncertainty and using apparently 'independent' researchers to do its dirty work. Such allies include the Cato Institute, for example. . . .
Furthermore there is simply no evidence to support the claim that putting tobacco out of sight at the point of sale leads to an increase in illegal sales. The vast majority of retailers are law-abiding and would not be tempted to try and sell illicit products. The rise in smuggling in both Ireland and Canada predates the implementation of display bans and there is no evidence of any causal association. Tobacco smuggling is clearly a huge problem that requires a strategic response but abandoning a policy that would stop tobacco being promoted to young people is not the answer.
Jump to full article » |