Categories · Health/Science
· Teen Smoking/Youth
· Food/Diet/Obesity
· Parenting / Family issues
|
Jump to full article: New York Times, 2009-10-04 Author: JAN HOFFMAN
Intro: "I DON'T need family-dinner studies to guilt-trip me," said Shannon Rubio, a mother of three teenage boys from Spring, Tex. "I do it to myself."
But just in case, Mrs. Rubio, here is the latest, from the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University:
Teenagers who eat with their families less than three times a week are more likely to turn to alcohol, tobacco and drugs than those who dine with their families five times a week.
, , ,
Since the first CASA study in 1996 saw an association between the frequency of family dinners and rates of adolescent substance abuse, numerous other studies have pointed to the importance of the family dinner. They suggest that family dinners have a positive impact on nutrition, verbal abilities, mental health and workers' stress. The news media passionately presses the cause; it's a cornerstone of the slow-parenting movement.
. . .
family dinner has become a red-hot item on the good-parent scorecard, by which mothers in particular judge one another and themselves, a tinderbox for networks like Twittermoms.com. (According to the NPD Group, a market research firm, women are responsible for about 80 percent of meals in the home.)
So it's not surprising that many parents, especially mothers, who work night shifts or long hours, or who, like Mrs. Rubio, have teenagers running every which way to activities, are painfully aware that nightly dinners 'round the table are something other families get to do.
Nor is it surprising that many others do veritable back flips to ensure that dinner and diners convene under the same roof, at the same time.
Jump to full article » |