Categories · Health/Science
· Business (Tobacco)
· Labels/Lights
non-USA, by Country · New Zealand
Organizations · BAT
|
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2009, 5:14doi:10.1186/1617-9625-5-14 Jump to full article: Tobacco Induced Diseases (de), 2009-09-25 Author: Nick Wilson1 , Jo Peace1 , Judy Li1 , Richard Edwards1 , Janet Hoek2 , James Stanley1 and George Thomson1
Intro: The GHWs on the purchased packs and street-collected packs both showed a distribution pattern that was generally consistent with the hypothesis ie, there were disproportionately more packs featuring images judged as "least disturbing" and disproportionately fewer of those with warnings judged "more disturbing". . . .
Conclusion
These results suggest that tobacco companies are not following the regulations, which requires even distribution of the seven different GHWs on cigarette packs; further monitoring is required to estimate the extent of this non-compliance. As an immediate measure, governments should strictly enforce all regulations applying to health warnings, particularly given that these are an effective tobacco control intervention that cost tax payers nothing.
Jump to full article » |