[Headlines Only] [Top Stories Only]
Categories
· Health/Science
· Business (Tobacco)
· Harm Reduction
· Alternate/Reduced Risk
· E-cigs
non-USA, by Country
· Qatar
Organizations
· FDA
· Ash

ASH RESPONDS TO E-CIGARETTE LETTER  

Jump to full article: ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) (us), 2009-08-15

Intro:

Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) has sent a communication which responds to a nasty letter written by an e-cigarette company. The nasty letter alleged that a news article pointing out some of the dangers of e-cigarettes reported by the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] "could lead to the deaths of smokers and electronic cigarette users." . . .

In summary, in evaluating e-cigarettes, we respectfully suggest that both your publication and your readers not rely upon the largely unsubstantiated representations of sellers (who have an obvious bias and usually no medical training or credibility), some allegedly supported by studies which have not been published in reputable medical journals and which may have been financed by the industry itself (thereby creating a clear conflict of interest).

Instead, we would urge your publication and your readers to rely upon the impartial governmental body charged by U.S. law with evaluating such products [FDA], major U.S. national health organizations which are impartial and have the necessary scientific authority and credibility to address these issues, and decisions by impartial and unbiased entities such as the Attorney General of Oregon, Facebook, etc.

In this regard you should find the links [URLs] set forth in this communication, as well as the many URLs contained in the linked documents, helpful. We urge you and your readers to consult them for the truth. The simple truth is that no reputable scientific study, much less one published in a major scientific or medical journal, has ever shown that e-cigarettes are any less dangerous than conventional tobacco cigarettes.

Jump to full article »