Categories
· Federal
· Secondhand Smoke
· Smokefree Policies
· Asbestos
· Workplaces
USA, by State
· Nevada
Organizations
· OSHA
|
Jump to full article: U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), 2008-09-25
Intro: Dear Mr. Czehowski:
This is in response to your letter to the OSHA San Francisco Regional Office, asking for clarification of a 1990 letter of interpretation regarding OSHA's asbestos standards. We understand that the State of Nevada has adopted standards identical to those of Federal OSHA and intends to follow the Federal enforcement policy. Your letter was forwarded to OSHA's national office for response . . .
The employer shall ensure that employees do not smoke in work areas where they are occupationally exposed to asbestos because of activities in that work area. (emphasis added)
As we explained in our 1990 letter to Mr. Sledge, the Agency determined that the health risk for smoking employees exposed to asbestos is substantially higher than nonsmoking ones. We explained in the preamble to the rule that "[t]his is an expansion of the present smoking ban, which, as in most OSHA health standards, is confined to regulated areas where exposures are elevated." (55 FR at 3726, February 5, 1990). The smoking ban in the asbestos standards does not specify a level of exposure. However, the exposure must have its source in the workplace. We have explained that this means that an employee who works in areas where there are operations that disturb asbestos, such as asbestos abatement and renovation activities, may be occupationally exposed, regardless of whether that employee disturbs or handles the asbestos.
Jump to full article » |