Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Doj
Organizations · RJR
|
Jump to full article: RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., 2009-05-22
Intro: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company is disappointed that the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed many of the findings of the district court in
the lawsuit United States v. Philip Morris et al, particularly the finding that cigarette manufacturers
violated federal racketeering laws.
“R.J. Reynolds strongly believes that neither the evidence presented at trial nor the legal standards
justify a finding of liability,” said Martin L. Holton III, senior vice president and general counsel for R.J.
Reynolds.
“R.J. Reynolds is pleased, however, that the Court of Appeals reaffirmed that the disgorgement of
profits is not an available remedy in this case,” Holton adds. “We are also pleased that the Court of
Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision not to require several of the remedies sought by the
government, and ruled that some of the remedies the district court ordered were too broad.”
Jump to full article » |