Categories · Health/Science
· Smokefree Policies
· costs/finances
· Dining/Entertainment
USA, by State · Minnesota
Organizations · MPAAT (ClearWay)
|
First study to compare partial and complete bans finds no significant difference in impact on employment Jump to full article: EurekAlert, 2009-05-18
Intro: a new study from Minnesota finds that there is no significant difference between partial bans, complete bans and even no bans, in terms of their impact on number of employees in restaurants and bars.
"This is the first study to compare the economic consequences of partial bans, total bans and no bans on smoking in public places. Because they don't have any differential effect on employment in restaurants and bars, it is obvious that a total ban on smoking is the only way to protect employees and patrons from second hand smoke, which is known to cause lung cancer, heart disease and respiratory diseases" according to study author Elizabeth Klein, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Professor in the Health Behavior & Health Promotion Division of the College of Public Health at Ohio State University. Klein conducted the study while she was at the University of Minnesota. The study is published in the June issue of Prevention Science, a peer reviewed journal of the Society for Prevention Research.
Klein studied ten cities in Minnesota from 2003 to 2006
Jump to full article » |