Categories
· Health/Science
· Lawsuits
· Lung Cancer
· Asbestos
|
Jump to full article: i-newswire, 2009-03-09
Intro: Research has proven, time and again that cigarette smoking does not contribute to developing mesothelioma. In fact, patients who never smoked were more likely to develop mesothelioma, than those who did smoke. Studies also show that asbestos exposure, alone, doesn't cause lung tissue cancer.
. . .
The combination of asbestos exposure and smoking is far more destructive than either by itself. This multiplication of risk is called a synergistic effect. Synergism produces an outcome that is greater than the sum of the components. In this situation, the outcome is the number of people who develop lung cancer, and the components are smokers exposed to asbestos compared to smokers with no exposure to asbestos. . . .
It's worth noting that smokers who have a history of asbestos exposure can reduce their risk of lung cancer as low as two to six times that of the general population in as little as ten years after quitting smoking. While this is still an undesirable risk, it is an immense improvement from 50-90 times. Since this is a controllable risk it is worth quitting smoking, however difficult that may be.
If you have received a diagnosis of mesothelioma or asbestosis, you may be entitled to compensation. Please visit the website of Parker, Dumler & Kiely, LLP, the experienced mesothelioma lawyers in Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, D.C.
Jump to full article » |