Categories · Secondhand Smoke
· Smokefree Policies
· Op-Ed
· Dining/Entertainment
USA, by State · Michigan
|
Jump to full article: Daily Oakland (MI) Press, 2008-06-22 Author: GLENN GILBERT Of The Oakland Press
Intro: Deloney thinks the House version of the ban was hypocritical due to its exemptions, indicating that some employees deserve protection from secondhand smoke while others do not.
He advises customers that, just as if you didn't like the food or service you would avoid a restaurant, add smoking to your criteria.
And to those arguing employees need the protection, perhaps they too can vote with their feet.
Do we really need a law to protect us from something that, for the most part, we can already avoid?
Jump to full article » |