Categories · Lawsuits
· Smokefree Policies
|
A Law Synopsis by the Tobacco Control Legal Consortium Jump to full article: Tobacco Law Center (William Mitchell College of Law), 2008-03-01 Author: Samantha K. Graff
Intro: Conclusion
The so-called “right to smoke” is actually a
smokescreen. There is no constitutional right
to smoke. Therefore, advocates are free to seek
enactment of new smoke-free laws or the amendment
or repeal of existing laws that harm the public health
despite claims by their opponents invoking a right to
smoke. So long as proposed smoke-free legislation is
rationally related to a legitimate government goal, the
Constitution will not stand in the way of its passage.
Courts are quick to find that smoke-free legislation
is rationally related to a legitimate government goal,
since they have long held that protecting the public’s
health is one of the most essential functions of
government.52
Jump to full article » |