[Headlines Only] [Top Stories Only]
Categories
· Lawsuits
· Smokefree Policies

There is No Constitutional Right to Smoke: 2008 (PDF) 

A Law Synopsis by the Tobacco Control Legal Consortium
Jump to full article: Tobacco Law Center (William Mitchell College of Law), 2008-03-01
Author: Samantha K. Graff

Intro:

Conclusion

The so-called “right to smoke” is actually a smokescreen. There is no constitutional right to smoke. Therefore, advocates are free to seek enactment of new smoke-free laws or the amendment or repeal of existing laws that harm the public health despite claims by their opponents invoking a right to smoke. So long as proposed smoke-free legislation is rationally related to a legitimate government goal, the Constitution will not stand in the way of its passage. Courts are quick to find that smoke-free legislation is rationally related to a legitimate government goal, since they have long held that protecting the public’s health is one of the most essential functions of government.52

Jump to full article »