[Headlines Only] [Top Stories Only]
Categories
· Teen Smoking/Youth
· Smokefree Policies
· Movies
· Op-Ed
non-USA, by Country
· UK
Organizations
· FOREST

The Debate: Should smoking in movies be 18-rated? 

Jump to full article: Liverpool Daily Post & Echo (uk), 2008-03-25
Author: Liza Williams, Liverpool Daily Post

Intro:

This week, we ask: Should films featuring smoking automatically be given an 18 rating? . . .

  • YES: The Case For - This would be a simple step to save young lives

    by Andy Hull, Chair of Smokefree Liverpool

    YES, yes, 1,650 times yes . . . That's the number of young Liverpudlians we reckon are currently smoking as a direct result of seeing "tobacco images" on screen. . . .

  • NO: The Case Against - This is not censorship - it is intimidation and bullying

    by Neil Rafferty, spokesman for Forest, the smokers' rights group . . .

    I've seen the anti-smoking extremists up close, so naturally I'm a bit cynical when they say it's all about "the children".

    When a film receives an 18 certificate, it excludes not only youngsters but many adults who don't like excessive violence and strong language. That's why film- makers like 15 certificates, because it says, "this is entertainment for grown-ups, but it doesn't go too far".

    The extremists know that by slapping an 18 certificate on smoking scenes, more and more film-makers will just stop showing smoking altogether until cinema will depict a world in which smoking does not exis. This is not just censorship - it is intimidation and bullying.

    And, if this was to become a reality, how long before scenes of excessive drinking or consumption of fast food are given the 18 certificate "to protect the children"?

    Jump to full article »