[Headlines Only] [Top Stories Only]
Categories
· Lawsuits
· Smokefree Policies
· Court Documents
· Dining/Entertainment
USA, by State
· Nebraska

Will Prout and Big John’s Billiards, Inc. v. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services  

Jump to full article: Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts, 2008-02-22

Intro:

The pool halls include a bar and a delicatessen where “burgers and fries” are prepared. The buildings have 18-foot ceilings, and each building has six large “smoke eaters” to remove smoke. A warning sign posted on the front door of each pool hall states: “WARNING[:] ‘SMOKER FRIENDLY POOL HALL[.]’ The air in this building may be hazardous to your health[.] NON-SMOKERSE NTER AT AT [sic] YOUR OWN RISK [.] IT’S YOUR CHOICE[.] Cigarette Smoke Cleaned Electronically[.]” . . .

Prout testified that he had made no attempt to comply with the Act’s requirements. In fact, he did not believe it would be possible to come into compliance by modifying the pool halls. However, Falter, the Department’s representative, testified that Big John’s could divide the Omaha building into smoking and nonsmoking areas and thereby comply with the Act.

CONCLUSION

We find no error on the record. The record shows that the district court’s affirmance of the Department’s denial of a waiver conformed to the law, was supported by competent evidence, and was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Jump to full article »