Email
Password
(Forgot Password?)
Jump to full article »
First, the plaintiff did not offer any evidence that the cigarettes Mr. Nunnally smoked were in any way defective. They offered nothing to the jury to support the notion that there was any feasible, safer alternative cigarette design that would have been used by Mr. Nunnally and that would have prevented his cancer. Michael W. Ulmer, lead RJRT counsel for the Nunnally case. <I>R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Pleased with Nunnally Verdict</I>
There's a lot of evidence from the fifth grade forward that [Nunnally] was aware of the dangers [of smoking].RJR witness Dr. George Seiden, a Shreveport, La., psychiatrist, who said he had performed a "psychological autopsy" on Joe Nunnally. Bayne, W., <I>Tobacco Trial May Go To Jury Today</I>