Tobacco News:

Articles: Articles From Edition 3932 (2009-06-27)
Search Terms: Language:
[Headlines Only] [All Stories]
Articles from Edition 3932 (2009-06-27)
[1 - 5 of 5]
Categories
· Business (Tobacco)
· Tobacco Control
non-USA, by Country
· China
Organizations
· WHO: FCTC

Fighting big tobacco ($$) 

Mainland anti-cigarette campaigners want to scrap the state tobacco monopoly but find little support for their cause
Jump to full article: South China Morning Post, 2009-06-22
Author: Mark O'Neill

Intro:

In a rare challenge to one of the mainland's most powerful institutions, a scholar has proposed the scrapping of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration and allowing private companies to compete on an equal basis in this lucrative sector. Zou Fangbin, an economics professor at the Guangdong University of Business Studies, says the monopoly discriminates against smokers and tobacco farmers, gives excessive wages and benefits to STMA officials, and encourages corruption and smuggling.

Established in January 1984, the STMA is one of the two biggest cigarette producers in the world, with Altria - the parent company of Philip Morris - in terms of sales revenue. . . .

One of the best-known anti-tobacco campaigners in the mainland is Yang Gonghuan, deputy director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention in the Ministry of Health.

"The issue is not the monopoly but the separation of the government from the tobacco producers, as demanded by the World Health Organisation," she said.

"How can someone supervise an industry in which he has a financial stake?"

She referred to article five, section three of the WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which Beijing has signed: it took effect on January 1. . . .

In its latest report on tobacco, published on May 31, Dr Yang's centre said the STMA was not implementing regulations set out by WHO convention.

Jump to full article »

Categories
· Federal
Organizations
· FDA

Tobacco industry experts weigh in on the new law 

Jump to full article: Los Angeles Times, 2009-06-29

Intro:

  • Blake Brown

    He is an agricultural economist at North Carolina State University and provides economic analysis and educational programming for tobacco and peanut producers. . . .

    "It's very hard to quantify the impact of regulations on the demand for tobacco. But I would think there would be two effects as a result of this legislation. One is, over time, we will see a substantial decline in cigarette consumption. I think the other potential impact is that these regulations call for modified-risk tobacco products. That will change the technology of the way cigarettes are made. These technology changes would likely lead to less tobacco per cigarette. . . .

  • Stanton Glantz . . .

    Because the legislation allows the Food and Drug Administration to appoint a scientific advisory committee that will include representatives from the tobacco industry, Glantz says he feels the FDA will be unable to accomplish far-reaching measures to control tobacco and reduce smoking rates. . . .

  • Scott Ramminger

    He's president of the American Wholesale Marketers Assn. . . . .

    "We were not in favor of the legislation. We don't really think it's appropriate for FDA to be regulating tobacco. We don't think having more regulations is going to accomplish anything except cost the taxpayers a lot more money. It's difficult to say exactly what impact it's going to have. It really depends on how FDA decides to implement the legislation. That is where the rubber hits the road. . . .

  • Patrick Reynolds . . .

    "My favorite part of the bill is the requirement for cigarette packs to carry graphic warning labels . . .

    "I'm not going to complain about the bill because 99% of it is absolutely fantastic," Reynolds says. But he worries that FDA regulation could take the electronic cigarette off the market. . . .

  • Jeffrey Wigand . . . It's better than no step. It is not by all means perfect . . .

    "Philip Morris had no business being at the negotiation table helping to structure a bill that was going to regulate them. . . . I'm quite chagrined that they allowed Philip Morris to draft legislation at all.

    "The bill will encourage more activity. . . . The crux is to de-normalize tobacco first and foremost for children.

    Jump to full article »

  • Categories
    · Federal
    Organizations
    · FDA

    The FDA's tobacco road 

    New legislation has given the Food and Drug Administration powers to regulate tobacco. The law extends oversight but bows to economic and administrative realities.
    Jump to full article: Los Angeles Times, 2009-06-29
    Author: Melissa Healy

    Intro:

    Tobacco is simply not like the drugs, medical devices and foods the FDA regulates: There are no demonstrable health benefits to tobacco against which the FDA can weigh the risks that go along with its use. In fact, some in Congress argued the FDA has no place in trying to merely limit the damage caused by a product that causes only addiction and harm. By giving its blessing to the sale of some tobacco products and denying others, they argue, the FDA may lead consumers (perhaps those who haven't had contact with the outside world for the last 44 years) to think those products are safe.

    Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Beverly Hills), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the author and champion of the FDA-tobacco bill, acknowledges that this is an unusual role for the FDA. But short of tobacco prohibition -- which, he says, "isn't going to work" -- the FDA is the only agency equipped to limit and reduce the damage that tobacco use does to the nation's health, and stem the recruitment of new smokers among the nation's youth.

    "The FDA is the exact agency that should have that authority -- it's a scientific organization with regulatory powers," Waxman said in an interview.

    Here are some of the bill's principal provisions, and the FDA's plans for carrying out its new mandate. . . .

    Another of the FDA's most intriguing new powers is the right to demand of tobacco companies details of research they have conducted on the contents and health effects of existing and future products --and, potentially, to release those findings to the public.

    That is likely to bring American consumers further details about the estimated 60 carcinogens and 4,000 toxic substances found in tobacco products or created when they're smoked.

    It is also likely to bring to light tobacco-sponsored marketing and scientific research on smokers' motivations and behavior, and their propensity to addiction, and what ingredients or advertising messages can enhance that propensity.

    Jump to full article »

    Categories
    · Smokefree Policies
    · Dining/Entertainment
    · waivers/exceptions
    non-USA, by Country
    · Greece

    Last-minute reprieve for offices ahead of Greek smoking ban 

    Jump to full article: Earth Times, 2009-06-26
    Author: Author : DPA

    Intro:

    Greece's health minister Friday announced last- minute exemptions for some offices and casinos, ahead of a public smoking ban to due come into force next week. The Greeks are considered one of the last bastions of smoking in the EU, and the proposed ban has already run into considerable opposition.

    Initially, minister Dimitris Avramopoulos had said authorities will enforce without exception smoking restrictions in public places, including offices, restaurants and bars as of July 1.

    But with less than a week to go Avramopoulos announced eleventh- hour exceptions regarding offices and casinos.

    All offices employing more than 50 people will have the right to maintain designated smoking rooms.

    Jump to full article »

    Categories
    · Business (Tobacco)
    · Smokefree Policies
    · Dining/Entertainment
    · Hookahs/Shisha / Water Pipes
    USA, by State
    · Connecticut

    Hookah lounges serve up culture, controversy  

    Mideastern cultural pastime clashes with towns' ordinances
    Jump to full article: Connecticut Post, 2009-06-27
    Author: Noelle Frampton STAFF WRITER

    Intro:

    Sky is apparently the first hookah lounge in Fairfield County and one of two in the region that opened this month. Trying to brew a new, culturally diverse pastime, the lounges unintentionally stoked up controversy and confusion among local and state officials who are mulling where they fit in with the state ban on smoking in public places.

    The confusion is evident in the reactions of Fairfield and Milford's health departments -- both of which initially told the lounges not to serve food or alcohol on the premises but didn't bar them from opening. Fairfield approved the opening after an inspection.

    Milford's department forced The Olive Tree Hookah Lounge to close June 19, about two weeks after it opened in a small shopping plaza on Bridgeport Avenue, citing state law and city ordinance.

    However, the department rescinded that order on Friday, following an appeal by Olive Tree owner Sammer Karout and his attorney. . . .

    Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said his office wasn't consulted regarding the lounges and he'd been unaware of them until contacted by a reporter last week.

    They seem "problematic" under state law, but he'd need to know all the details to know whether they're within legal boundaries, he said, adding that the smoking ban is typically enforced by local police.

    Jump to full article »