Tobacco News:

Categories: Olympics
RSS: http://tobacco.org/newsfeed/category/olympics.rss
Choose type:
Search Term(s):
[Headlines Only] [All Stories]
Olympics
[1 - 4 of 4]
Categories
· Cessation
· Zyban
· Olympics

Anti-smoking drug could tempt athletes to cheat ($$) 

Jump to full article: New Scientist, 2008-01-14

Intro:

This is an Olympic year, and athletes the world over are gearing up for the Beijing games in August. There they will face afternoon temperatures that average 30 °C and can hit 42 °C, along with high humidity that will make cooling down harder. In such conditions athletes in endurance sports reach exhaustion long before their muscles would normally tire, as their brains tell them to ease up before they reach brain-damaging temperatures over 40 °C.

Romain Meeusen of the Free University of Brussels (VUB) in Belgium discovered in 2005 that the drug bupropion can cheat this switch.

Jump to full article »

Categories
· Secondhand Smoke
· Letter
· Olympics

Rapid responses for Enstrom and Kabat, 326 (7398) 1057-0 

Jump to full article: British Medical Journal, 2003-05-18

Intro:

  • Clive D Bates . . . Publication in the BMJ is 'capture' of one of the major fortresses of evidence-based practice by the tobacco industry and its lobbyists - and it will serve them very well all around the world for many years. How careful was the BMJ and its reviewers when they handed them this trophy? If the understanding of the facts on second hand smoke had indeed changed then the tobacco control community needs to be prepared to rethink. But it doesn't look like the facts have changed at all, just that the BMJ has let a shoddy study assume the status of 'facts'.

    The second point is about what the BMJ did to frame the story for the media.I would like to invite the BMJ to post on the web site: 1. The press release 2. The peer reviewers' comments (anonymously)

    My hunch is that the BMJ is being challenged for the wrong things... conflicts of interest are important, but they are less important when there is rigorous peer review and careful reporting of the findings.

  • We intend publishing details of the paper's peer review next week.

    Competing interests: I am employed by the BMJ, which published the study.

  • Richard Smith: . . . Not long ago I was something of a hero of the antitobacco movement-- because I resigned my professorship at Nottingham University when it accepted money from British American Tobacco. I felt somewhat embarrassed by the whole episode. I was no hero. But now I'm a pariah for publishing a piece of research funded by the tobacco industry. Because of some sort of personality defect that is common among editors I'm more attracted to being a pariah than a hero, but I don't think that I deserve to be a pariah. . . .

    We are planning to post on our website all the comments of the reviewers, our statistician, and the hanging committee. I hope that they will be up soon after the weekend. We judged this paper to be a useful contribution to an important debate. We may be wrong, as we are are with many papers. That's science. But I remain convinced that it would have been wrong to reject the study simply because it was funded by the tobacco industry.

  • How ironic that the BMJ accepts without comment a letter from someone who declares "no competing interests" but is a "Board member of Forces International"?

    Does no one at the BMJ know anything about this tobacco-industry advocacy group? Is it possible that you are so naive you do not understand how sophisticated the tobacco industry's advocates are?

  • Deborah Arnott Director, ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) . . .

    Publication of the report has given rise to media headlines such as “Passive Smoking ‘Not so deadly’” and “Passive smoking may not damage your Health”. And the tobacco industry is already misusing its findings.

    It appears that in this case the BMJ’s desire for publicity and controversy may have undermined its professional standards to an unacceptable degree. We call on the editor of the BMJ to publicly retract the article and publish the American Cancer Society’s detailed criticisms in the next edition.

  • Simon Chapman: The major concerns about the authors' industry affiliations remain. However, if the credibility of the study is to be challenged on the basis of its methods and findings, it would seem that further information should be provided by the authors on the data they used to support their statement about the "direct relation" of domestic ETS exposure with total ETS exposure. Given the ubiquity of smoking in workplaces and indoor leisure venues in the 1960s and most of the 1970s and 1980s, I am struggling to conceive of a hypothesis which would suggest that non- smoking couples would have avoided significant ETS exposure.

    Competing interests: I am editor of Tobacco Control,

  • Gio B. Gori: . . . Bully for the BMJ Editors, probably the only fearless editorial crew left in the world. Were they suborned by Big Tobacco? Spin scoundrels likely will ventilate as such, but who is Big Tobacco anyway? . . .

    The author was director of the Smoking and Health Program of the US National Cancer Institute, for which he received the US Public Health Service Superior Service Award. In becoming a critic of official allegations, he received occasional support from the tobacco industry. In matters of tobacco and health he has sought in vain other support that might equally come without strings attached.

    Jump to full article »

  • Categories
    · Society
    · Olympics
    Organizations
    · Legacy
    · Olympics

    Edgy anti-tobacco TV ads get prime-time audience 

    Spots featuring body bags air during Olympics
    Jump to full article: Baltimore (MD) Sun, 2000-09-21
    Author: Scott Shane / Sun Staff

    Intro:

    A young man with a bullhorn shouts up to gray-suited executives who peer warily from their windows several stories above.

    "We're gonna leave these here," he says, "so you can see what 1,200 people actually look like!"

    The edgy anti-smoking ad airing on NBC during the Olympics is most Americans' first encounter with the work of the American Legacy Foundation, which will get $1.5 billion over the next five years from the national tobacco settlement to persuade teen-agers not to smoke. . .

    With money and marketing sophistication health advocates could not dream of a few years ago, the ad campaign represents a new phase in the battle against smoking, according to experts on tobacco history.

    "Now the tables are turned," said Allan M. Brandt, a medical historian at Harvard University who is writing a book on the history of smoking. . .

    "We certainly share a goal with the American Legacy Foundation, which is to reduce youth smoking," said Mike Pfeil, vice president of communications for Philip Morris USA. "However, we have been disappointed with some of the ads and other approaches the foundation has taken." He included in his criticism the anti-tobacco Web site created for the foundation's "Truth" marketing campaign, thetruth.com.

    "I think it's fair to say we don't think some of their approaches are consistent with the spirit of the settlement," he said.

    Healton, the foundation president and former associate dean of the Columbia University School of Public Health, disagreed. She noted that in recent court testimony and advertising, tobacco executives have cited the foundation's work as evidence of their own changed attitudes.

    "If we're doing such a bad job, they're sure taking a lot of credit for it," she said.

    Jump to full article »

    Categories
    · Society
    · Olympics
    Organizations
    · Legacy
    · Olympics

    Television Campaigns Create Controversy During Summer Games 

    Jump to full article: New York Times, 2000-09-19
    Author: STUART ELLIOTT

    Intro:

    The decisions involved a commercial for a national antismoking campaign known as Truth, which is now running after being turned down in February . . .

    Dr. Cheryl Healton, president and chief executive of the foundation, said that its board decided to resubmit the commercial to NBC as part of a substantial purchase of commercial time during the network's coverage of the Olympics.

    The goal was to show the spot to a wider audience, she added, as well as four new commercials with similar themes. The new spots introduce the body-bag imagery into settings traditionally associated with cigarette ads like a Western landscape, a chic nightclub and a sunny beach.

    "It's incumbent upon us to present to young people the health consequences and social costs of smoking," said Dr. Healton, who is also a professor of public health at Columbia University. "The Olympic Games are an incredible venue for reaching adolescents as well as adults."

    So far, he added, "I haven't heard any complaints."

    Jump to full article »


    Quotes from this article:

    It's incumbent upon us to present to young people the health consequences and social costs of smoking. . . The Olympic Games are an incredible venue for reaching adolescents as well as adults.
    Dr. Cheryl Healton, president and chief executive of the American Legacy Foundation, which has convinced NBC to run its "Body Bags" commercial. ELLIOTT, S., <I>Television Campaigns Create Controversy During Summer Games</I>